J R Vardi1, G H Tadros, M T Anselmo, S D Rafla. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maimonides Medical Center, State University of New York, Brooklyn.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We conducted a retrospective review of 169 consecutive patients diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma to evaluate the advantage of exploratory laparotomy according to the new International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification as compared with clinical staging. METHODS: All 169 patients were admitted to the Department of Gynecologic Oncology from August 1980 through June 1988 and underwent exploratory laparotomy, which included total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and peritoneal washings. We performed complete lymph node dissection of the pelvic and the para-aortic areas on 87 patients with clinical stages I and II. Eighteen more patients were upgraded to stage III or IV during exploratory laparotomy with lymph node biopsy. Forty-nine patients did not have lymph node dissection because of age and medical contraindications. In 15 patients with clinical stage III or IV, lymph node dissection was performed as part of debulking surgery. Clinical staging showed 135 patients (80%) with stage I, 19 (11%) with stage II, three (2%) with stage III, and 12 (7%) with stage IV carcinoma. RESULTS: Surgical restaging according to the new FIGO classification resulted in 117 patients (69%) with stage I, seven (4%) with stage II, 23 (14%) with stage III, and 22 (13%) with stage IV carcinoma. Thirty patients (19%) of 154 with clinical stage I or II had extrauterine spread. Thirty-three of 169 patients (19.5%) had their clinical staging upgraded and six (3.5%) were downgraded. The 5-year actuarial survival rates for clinical stages I, II, and IV were 83, 64, and 8%, respectively. The actuarial survival rates for surgical stages I, II, III, and IV were 89, 100, 58, and 24%, respectively. Cases surgically staged as I with high-risk variables (eg, poor differentiation, unfavorable histologic types, and deep myometrial invasion) or stage II received 5000 cGy to the whole pelvis using a box technique. Patients with surgical stage III or IV received adjuvant intravenous chemotherapy (eg, doxorubicin, hydrochloride, Cytoxan, and cisplatin) consecutively for ten to 12 courses. Megestrol acetate was added for 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical staging after exploratory laparotomy defined the true extent of disease and identified 20% of the cases that may escape effective treatment.
OBJECTIVE: We conducted a retrospective review of 169 consecutive patients diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma to evaluate the advantage of exploratory laparotomy according to the new International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification as compared with clinical staging. METHODS: All 169 patients were admitted to the Department of Gynecologic Oncology from August 1980 through June 1988 and underwent exploratory laparotomy, which included total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and peritoneal washings. We performed complete lymph node dissection of the pelvic and the para-aortic areas on 87 patients with clinical stages I and II. Eighteen more patients were upgraded to stage III or IV during exploratory laparotomy with lymph node biopsy. Forty-nine patients did not have lymph node dissection because of age and medical contraindications. In 15 patients with clinical stage III or IV, lymph node dissection was performed as part of debulking surgery. Clinical staging showed 135 patients (80%) with stage I, 19 (11%) with stage II, three (2%) with stage III, and 12 (7%) with stage IV carcinoma. RESULTS: Surgical restaging according to the new FIGO classification resulted in 117 patients (69%) with stage I, seven (4%) with stage II, 23 (14%) with stage III, and 22 (13%) with stage IV carcinoma. Thirty patients (19%) of 154 with clinical stage I or II had extrauterine spread. Thirty-three of 169 patients (19.5%) had their clinical staging upgraded and six (3.5%) were downgraded. The 5-year actuarial survival rates for clinical stages I, II, and IV were 83, 64, and 8%, respectively. The actuarial survival rates for surgical stages I, II, III, and IV were 89, 100, 58, and 24%, respectively. Cases surgically staged as I with high-risk variables (eg, poor differentiation, unfavorable histologic types, and deep myometrial invasion) or stage II received 5000 cGy to the whole pelvis using a box technique. Patients with surgical stage III or IV received adjuvant intravenous chemotherapy (eg, doxorubicin, hydrochloride, Cytoxan, and cisplatin) consecutively for ten to 12 courses. Megestrol acetate was added for 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical staging after exploratory laparotomy defined the true extent of disease and identified 20% of the cases that may escape effective treatment.
Authors: E Hernandez; D DeFilippis; K O'Connell; G Balsara; S Keyamanesh; L Anderson; P B Heller Journal: J Natl Med Assoc Date: 1996-02 Impact factor: 1.798