Literature DB >> 16357274

Stocking density and feed barrier design affect the feeding and social behavior of dairy cattle.

J M Huzzey1, T J DeVries, P Valois, M A G von Keyserlingk.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to: 1) evaluate how stocking density at the feed bunk affects feeding and social behavior of dairy cows; and 2) determine if this effect is further influenced by the type of feed barrier used. Thirty-six lactating Holstein cows, allotted to 4 groups, were subjected to each of 4 stocking density treatments and 2 feed barrier treatments. Initially, 2 groups were assigned to a headlock barrier, and 2 groups to a post-and-rail barrier. Each group was then exposed to 4 stocking density treatments (0.81, 0.61, 0.41, and 0.21 m/cow, corresponding to 1.33, 1.00, 0.67, and 0.33 headlocks/cow), in 4 successive 10-d treatment periods. After these periods, the feed barriers were switched between groups and the 4 stocking density treatments were readministered. Time-lapse video was used to quantify feeding, standing, and aggressive behavior at the feed bunk. Daily feeding times were greater and duration of inactive standing in the feeding area was less when using a post-and-rail compared with a headlock feed barrier. Feeding time decreased and inactive standing increased for both barrier designs as stocking density increased at the feed bunk. Cows were displaced more often from the feeding area when the stocking density was increased, and this effect was greater for cows using the post-and-rail feed barrier. Cows ranked lower in the social hierarchy at the feed bunk were displaced more often when feeding at a post-and-rail barrier, particularly at high stocking densities. Therefore, we recommend avoiding overstocking at the feed bunk to increase feeding activity and reduce competition. Use of a barrier that provides some physical separation between adjacent cows, such as a headlock feed barrier, can be used to further reduce competition at the feed bunk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16357274     DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72075-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  21 in total

1.  Impact of exercise on productivity, behavior, and immune functioning of weaned Bos indicus-cross calves housed in drylots.

Authors:  C L Daigle; B Jackson; R Gill; T A Wickersham; J E Sawyer
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Spatio-Thermal Variability and Behaviour as Bio-Thermal Indicators of Heat Stress in Dairy Cows in a Compost Barn: A Case Study.

Authors:  Frederico Márcio Corrêa Vieira; Allessandro Augusto Soares; Piotr Herbut; Edgar de Souza Vismara; Dorota Godyń; Aline Cristina Zambiasi Dos Santos; Tainara da Silva Lambertes; Wellington Felipe Caetano
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Synchronization of Dairy Cows Does Not Limit the Behavioral Response to Treatment in Mixed Treatment Experimental Designs.

Authors:  Meagan T M King; Robin E Crossley; Trevor J DeVries
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-11-11

4.  Dairy Cows Produce Less Milk and Modify Their Behaviour during the Transition between Tie-Stall to Free-Stall.

Authors:  Jan Broucek; Michal Uhrincat; Stefan Mihina; Miloslav Soch; Andrea Mrekajova; Anton Hanus
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Stress, strain, and pregnancy outcome in postpartum cows.

Authors:  Matthew C Lucy
Journal:  Anim Reprod       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 1.807

6.  Reduced density and visually complex apiaries reduce parasite load and promote honey production and overwintering survival in honey bees.

Authors:  Travis L Dynes; Jennifer A Berry; Keith S Delaplane; Berry J Brosi; Jacobus C de Roode
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Competition Strategies of Metritic and Healthy Transition Cows.

Authors:  Borbala Foris; Marina A G von Keyserlingk; Daniel M Weary
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 8.  The Influence of Different Types of Outdoor Access on Dairy Cattle Behavior.

Authors:  Anne-Marieke C Smid; Daniel M Weary; Marina A G von Keyserlingk
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-05-13

9.  Lameness Prevalence and Risk Factors in Large Dairy Farms in Upstate New York. Model Development for the Prediction of Claw Horn Disruption Lesions.

Authors:  Carla Foditsch; Georgios Oikonomou; Vinícius Silva Machado; Marcela Luccas Bicalho; Erika Korzune Ganda; Svetlana Ferreira Lima; Rodolfo Rossi; Bruno Leonardo Ribeiro; Arieli Kussler; Rodrigo Carvalho Bicalho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Social Licking in Pregnant Dairy Heifers.

Authors:  Grazyne Tresoldi; Daniel M Weary; Luiz Carlos Pinheiro Machado Filho; Marina A G von Keyserlingk
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.