BACKGROUND: Studies on cognitive functioning in breast cancer patients point out that a subset of women exhibit chemotherapy-related neuropsychological impairment. Thereby, high-dose therapy may elevate the risk of cognitive dysfunctions. The primary purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of high-dose versus standard-dose chemotherapy on the late neuropsychological outcome in randomized assigned high-risk breast cancer survivors. Next to focusing prevalence, function specificity and extent of cognitive impairment, the question as to whether doses-dependent group differences occur was investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four high-dose and 23 standard-dose patients 5 years, on average, after treatment underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. In addition, 29 early-stage breast cancer patients matched for age, education and time since treatment were recruited as a comparison group. RESULTS:Global cognitive impairment was observed in 8% of high-dose versus 13% of standard-dose compared with 3% of early-stage breast cancer patients. Compared with normative data, all patient groups performed worse on one attention subtest measuring the simple reaction time (P < 0.001 in each case). By contrast, no significant between-group differences on the late neuropsychological outcome were found. CONCLUSIONS: Five years after treatment, standard-dose patients were slightly, but not significantly, more impaired in cognitive performance than high-dose patients.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Studies on cognitive functioning in breast cancerpatients point out that a subset of women exhibit chemotherapy-related neuropsychological impairment. Thereby, high-dose therapy may elevate the risk of cognitive dysfunctions. The primary purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of high-dose versus standard-dose chemotherapy on the late neuropsychological outcome in randomized assigned high-risk breast cancer survivors. Next to focusing prevalence, function specificity and extent of cognitive impairment, the question as to whether doses-dependent group differences occur was investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four high-dose and 23 standard-dose patients 5 years, on average, after treatment underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. In addition, 29 early-stage breast cancerpatients matched for age, education and time since treatment were recruited as a comparison group. RESULTS: Global cognitive impairment was observed in 8% of high-dose versus 13% of standard-dose compared with 3% of early-stage breast cancerpatients. Compared with normative data, all patient groups performed worse on one attention subtest measuring the simple reaction time (P < 0.001 in each case). By contrast, no significant between-group differences on the late neuropsychological outcome were found. CONCLUSIONS: Five years after treatment, standard-dose patients were slightly, but not significantly, more impaired in cognitive performance than high-dose patients.
Authors: Icro Meattini; Isacco Desideri; Giulio Francolini; Agnese Vannini; Marco Perna; Pietro Garlatti; Roberta Grassi; Lorenzo Livi Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2017-03-31 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: D D Correa; J C Root; M Kryza-Lacombe; M Mehta; S Karimi; M L Hensley; N Relkin Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: Jeffrey M Long; Garrick D Lee; Bennett Kelley-Bell; Edward L Spangler; Evelyn J Perez; Dan L Longo; Rafael de Cabo; Sige Zou; Peter R Rapp Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 2011-08-22 Impact factor: 3.533
Authors: Heather S L Jim; Kristin M Phillips; Sari Chait; Leigh Anne Faul; Mihaela A Popa; Yun-Hsiang Lee; Mallory G Hussin; Paul B Jacobsen; Brent J Small Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-08-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mukaila A Raji; Lynsey P Tamborello; Yong-Fang Kuo; Hyunsu Ju; Jean L Freeman; Dong D Zhang; Sharon H Giordano; James S Goodwin Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2008-12-09 Impact factor: 3.064