Literature DB >> 16356819

Suspected and incidental pulmonary embolism on multidetector-row CT: analysis of technical and morphological factors influencing the diagnosis in a cross-sectional cancer centre patient cohort.

C Engelke1, P Manstein, E J Rummeny, K Marten.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess technical and computed tomography (CT) predictors of true-positive (TP) and false-negative (FN) radiological diagnoses in a retrospective patient cohort with pulmonary embolism (PE) in the setting of a cancer centre.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two thousand, four hundred and twelve consecutive chest multidetector-row CT images from 1869 patients were reviewed for presence of PE. CT protocols and TP and FN radiological reports were determined and the clinical files reviewed for suspicion of PE. The severity of PE was assessed by an arterial obstruction index. Ancillary pulmonary findings were scored qualitatively and on a lobar basis. Statistical tests included analysis of variance and univariate and multivariate logistic regressions.
RESULTS: Ninety-one out of a total of 111 PE-positive images were included. Thirty-five patients had clinically suspected PE; 56 were not suspected of having PE. Forty-eight patients had TP diagnoses; 43 (39 of whom were not suspected of having PE) had FN radiological diagnoses. FN diagnoses were most frequent in oesophageal (17/19; 89.5%) and standard chest CT (19/35; 54.3%). Pulmonary CT angiography was associated with TP diagnosis (p<0.0001), whereas oesophageal CT was associated with FN diagnosis (p=0.001). Artefacts and arterial attenuation did not influence PE detection (p=0.017 and 0.066 for artefacts and arterial attenuation, respectively). However, the arterial obstruction index strongly predicted PE diagnosis (p=0.001). This was confirmed on multivariate analysis (p=0.041, 0.027 and 0.020 for pulmonary CT angiography, oesophageal protocols and arterial obstruction index, respectively). When stratified for clinically unsuspected cases, the arterial obstruction index remained the only predictor of PE diagnosis (p=0.009).
CONCLUSION: Predictors of PE diagnosis were PE severity and technical factors; the latter were linked to clinical suspicion of PE. Arterial enhancement appears unlikely to contribute to missed diagnoses, if judged adequate for diagnosis of PE, and ancillary chest findings are unlikely to improve embolus detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16356819     DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2005.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  7 in total

1.  Unsuspected pulmonary embolism on CT scanning: yet another headache for clinicians?

Authors:  Sujal R Desai
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Unsuspected pulmonary thromboemboli: a continuing clinical challenge.

Authors:  Herbert L Fred
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2013

3.  Incidence of pulmonary embolism in oncologic outpatients at a tertiary cancer center.

Authors:  Atul B Shinagare; Mengye Guo; Hiroto Hatabu; Katherine M Krajewski; Katherine Andriole; Annick D Van den Abbeele; Pamela J DiPiro; Mizuki Nishino
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Current treatment of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Nigel S Key; Raj S Kasthuri
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 8.311

Review 5.  Is the lung scan alive and well? Facts and controversies in defining the role of lung scintigraphy for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the era of MDCT.

Authors:  John H Reid; Emmanuel E Coche; Tomio Inoue; Edmund E Kim; Maurizio Dondi; Naoyuki Watanabe; Giuliano Mariani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Incidental pulmonary embolism in cancer patients: clinical characteristics and outcome--a comprehensive cancer center experience.

Authors:  Hikmat N Abdel-Razeq; Asem H Mansour; Yousef M Ismael
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2011-03-15

7.  Incidental pulmonary embolism in oncologic patients-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hans-Jonas Meyer; Andreas Wienke; Alexey Surov
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 3.603

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.