Literature DB >> 16356818

Distance between the rectal wall and mesorectal fascia measured by MRI: Effect of rectal distension and implications for preoperative prediction of a tumour-free circumferential resection margin.

A Slater1, S Halligan, S A Taylor, M Marshall.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the effect of rectal distension, used by some workers to facilitate staging, on mesorectal tissues. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ninety-seven consecutive rectal cancer staging MRI examinations were identified of which 76 were analysable: 48 studies were performed using rectal insufflation of 100 ml room air and 28 were performed without distension. Median age was 69 and 72 years, respectively. In each patient a single experienced observer measured the distance from the outer rectal wall to the inner margin of the mesorectal fascia at four locations (12, 3, 6 and 9 o'clock), excluding sites of tumour involvement, from the T1-weighted axial image at the level of the sacro-coccygeal junction. The two groups of measurements were compared using Mann-Whitney test statistic, and frequencies then categorized into <5 mm or > or =5 mm, and compared using Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS: The median distance between the rectal wall and mesorectal fascia in the distended group was approximately half that found in the non-distended group, and significantly lower at the 3, 6 and 9 o'clock positions (p<0.001). 68/167 (41%) of measurements were 5mm or less, compared with 19/104 (18%) in the non-distended group (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Rectal distension before MRI significantly reduces the distance between the rectal wall and mesorectal fascia. Although this is advocated to facilitate visualization of the primary tumour, it potentially affects the accuracy with which a clear circumferential resection margin can be predicted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16356818     DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2005.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  21 in total

1.  Preoperative evaluation of the depth of anal canal invasion in very low rectal cancer by magnetic resonance imaging and surgical indications for intersphincteric resection.

Authors:  Yoshiko Bamba; Michio Itabashi; Shingo Kameoka
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  The influence of endorectal filling on rectal cancer staging with MRI.

Authors:  Rutger Ch Stijns; Tom Wj Scheenen; Johannes Hw de Wilt; Jurgen J Fütterer; Regina Gh Beets-Tan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Diffusion-weighted MRI to assess response to chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: main interpretation pitfalls and their use for teaching.

Authors:  Doenja M J Lambregts; Miriam M van Heeswijk; Andrea Delli Pizzi; Saskia G C van Elderen; Luisa Andrade; Nicky H G M Peters; Peter A M Kint; Margreet Osinga-de Jong; Shandra Bipat; Rik Ooms; Max J Lahaye; Monique Maas; Geerard L Beets; Frans C H Bakers; Regina G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  MRI of Rectal Cancer: Tumor Staging, Imaging Techniques, and Management.

Authors:  Natally Horvat; Camila Carlos Tavares Rocha; Brunna Clemente Oliveira; Iva Petkovska; Marc J Gollub
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging for the clinical management of rectal cancer patients: recommendations from the 2012 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting.

Authors:  Regina G H Beets-Tan; Doenja M J Lambregts; Monique Maas; Shandra Bipat; Brunella Barbaro; Filipe Caseiro-Alves; Luís Curvo-Semedo; Helen M Fenlon; Marc J Gollub; Sofia Gourtsoyianni; Steve Halligan; Christine Hoeffel; Seung Ho Kim; Andrea Laghi; Andrea Maier; Søren R Rafaelsen; Jaap Stoker; Stuart A Taylor; Michael R Torkzad; Lennart Blomqvist
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Current controversy, confusion, and imprecision in the use and interpretation of rectal MRI.

Authors:  Marc J Gollub; Chandana Lall; Neeraj Lalwani; Michael H Rosenthal
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2019-11

Review 7.  MRI in local staging of rectal cancer: an update.

Authors:  Umit Tapan; Mustafa Ozbayrak; Servet Tatlı
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.630

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in rectal cancer: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Michael R Torkzad; Lars Påhlman; Bengt Glimelius
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-08-15

9.  T-staging of rectal cancer: accuracy of 3.0 Tesla MRI compared with 1.5 Tesla.

Authors:  Monique Maas; Doenja M J Lambregts; Max J Lahaye; Geerard L Beets; Walter Backes; Roy F A Vliegen; Margreet Osinga-de Jong; Joachim E Wildberger; Regina G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2012-06

Review 10.  Imaging paradigms in assessment of rectal carcinoma: loco-regional and distant staging.

Authors:  Thian Yee Liang; Gopinathan Anil; Bertrand W L Ang
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.