Literature DB >> 16356526

A reversed structure-from-motion effect for simultaneously viewed stereo-surfaces.

Julian Martin Fernandez1, Bart Farell.   

Abstract

A spatially flat stimulus is perceived as varying in depth if its velocity structure is consistent with that of a three-dimensional (3D) object. This is structure from motion (SFM). We asked if the converse effect also exists. A motion-from-structure effect would skew an object's perceived velocity structure to make it more consistent with the 3D structure provided by its depth cues. This proposed phenomenon should be opposite in sign from velocity constancy and could potentially interfere with it. Previous tests of velocity constancy compared stimuli presented at different times, not simultaneously. This explains why a reversal of SFM has not been previously reported, as it is expected to appear only for simultaneous presentations. We tested this prediction using random-dot stereograms to define two adjacent moving surfaces separated in stereoscopic depth. We found that subjects did not perceive velocity constancy with either simultaneous or sequential stimulus presentations. For sequential presentations, subjects matched retinal speeds, in agreement with previous work. However, for simultaneous presentations, the nearer surface was seen as moving faster when both surfaces were moving with the same retinal speed, an effect opposite in polarity from velocity constancy and a signature of the motion-from-structure phenomenon.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16356526      PMCID: PMC1622922          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.10.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  10 in total

1.  Computing relief structure from motion with a distributed velocity and disparity representation.

Authors:  Julián Martín Fernández; Brendon Watson; Ning Qian
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Visual perception of extent and the geometry of visual space.

Authors:  John M Foley; Nilton P Ribeiro-Filho; José A Da Silva
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  On the limits of stereoscopic vision.

Authors:  K N OGLE
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1952-10

4.  Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis.

Authors:  E B Johnston
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Factors that affect depth perception in stereoscopic displays.

Authors:  R Patterson; L Moe; T Hewitt
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.888

6.  Is there a constancy for velocity?

Authors:  S P McKee; L Welch
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Human velocity and direction discrimination measured with random dot patterns.

Authors:  B De Bruyn; G A Orban
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Perception of 3-D structure from motion: the role of velocity gradients and segmentation boundaries.

Authors:  V S Ramachandran; S Cobb; D Rogers-Ramachandran
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-10

9.  Mechanisms of velocity constancy.

Authors:  E Zohary; A C Sittig
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Two factors in the perception of velocity at a distance.

Authors:  W Epstein
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.