Literature DB >> 16356294

Gender differences in the prevalence of DSM-IV and ICD-10 PTSD.

Lorna Peters1, Cathy Issakidis, Tim Slade, Gavin Andrews.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gender differences in the prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder were examined by analysing discrepancies between the DSM-IV and ICD-10 diagnostic systems.
METHOD: Data from the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being (n=10641) were analysed at the diagnostic, criterion and symptom level for DSM-IV and ICD-10 PTSD for males versus females.
RESULTS: While there was a significant gender difference in the prevalence of PTSD for ICD-10, no such difference was found for DSM-IV. The pattern of gender difference at the diagnostic level was mirrored in the pattern of gender differences at the criterion level for both DSM-IV and ICD-10. Females only endorsed three symptoms at a significantly higher rate than males. For all other symptoms, endorsement was equal. This apparently small gender difference at the symptom level was sufficient to cause the gender difference at the diagnostic level for ICD-10, but not DSM-IV because of the different manner in which symptoms are configured into criteria in each of the diagnostic systems.
CONCLUSIONS: Gender differences in ICD-10 PTSD but not in DSM PTSD diagnoses are attributable in this study to different patterns of endorsement of symptoms by males and females. Possible reasons for the differential endorsement of symptoms and implications for the use of epidemiological instruments are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16356294     DOI: 10.1017/S003329170500591X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Med        ISSN: 0033-2917            Impact factor:   7.723


  9 in total

1.  Evaluating symptom expression as a function of a posttraumatic stress disorder severity.

Authors:  Kathleen M Palm; David R Strong; Laura MacPherson
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2008-03-20

2.  Assessing impact of differential symptom functioning on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnosis.

Authors:  Qiwei He; Cees A W Glas; Bernard P Veldkamp
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  Psychiatric symptom typology in a sample of youth receiving substance abuse treatment services: associations with self-reported child maltreatment and sexual risk behaviors.

Authors:  Assaf Oshri; Jonathan G Tubman; James Jaccard
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2011-11

4.  Family, friends, and 12-month PTSD among African Americans.

Authors:  Ann W Nguyen; Linda M Chatters; Robert Joseph Taylor; Debra Siegel Levine; Joseph A Himle
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.328

5.  Psychiatric symptom patterns, proximal risk factors, and sexual risk behaviors among youth in outpatient substance abuse treatment.

Authors:  Assaf Oshri; Jonathan G Tubman; Eric F Wagner; Staci Leon-Morris; Julie Snyders
Journal:  Am J Orthopsychiatry       Date:  2008-10

6.  Sex differences in DSM-IV posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms expression using item response theory: A population-based study.

Authors:  Fabrice Rivollier; Hugo Peyre; Nicolas Hoertel; Carlos Blanco; Frédéric Limosin; Richard Delorme
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 4.839

Review 7.  Animal models of PTSD: a challenge to be met.

Authors:  Gal Richter-Levin; Oliver Stork; Mathias V Schmidt
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 15.992

Review 8.  Title: "Labels Matter: Is it stress or is it Trauma?"

Authors:  Gal Richter-Levin; Carmen Sandi
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 6.222

9.  Gender differences in a wide range of trauma symptoms after victimization and accidental traumas: a cross-sectional study in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Erik Ganesh Iyer Søegaard; Zhanna Kan; Rishav Koirala; Edvard Hauff; Suraj Bahadur Thapa
Journal:  Eur J Psychotraumatol       Date:  2021-09-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.