Literature DB >> 16354779

Take-off and landing forces in jumping frogs.

Sandra Nauwelaerts1, Peter Aerts.   

Abstract

Anurans use a saltatorial (jumping) mode of locomotion. A jumping cycle can be divided into four subphases: propulsion, flight, landing and recovery. We studied the landing phase during locomotion in Rana esculenta by measuring the ground reaction forces during propulsion and landing over a range of distances. Landing performance affects locomotor ability in jumping frogs. Landing and recovery together take up one third of the locomotor cycle. Peak landing forces are on average almost three times larger than propulsive forces. The forelimbs appear to be fully extended when they make contact with the substrate and absorb the first impact peak. The height of this peak varies depending on arm positioning and jumping distance. Since the stiffness of the arms stays constant over the full jumping range, it is possible that this is a limiting factor in the ability of the forelimbs to work as dampers. A spring-dashpot model is used to model the effect of arm angle at touch down. Damping during landing is performed by placing the forelimbs at an optimal angle to cancel frictional forces effectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16354779     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  18 in total

1.  Landing in basal frogs: evidence of saltational patterns in the evolution of anuran locomotion.

Authors:  Richard L Essner; Daniel J Suffian; Phillip J Bishop; Stephen M Reilly
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2010-07-13

2.  Morphological correlates of aquatic and terrestrial locomotion in a semi-aquatic frog, Rana esculenta: no evidence for a design conflict.

Authors:  Sandra Nauwelaerts; Jason Ramsay; Peter Aerts
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Take-off and landing kinetics of a free-ranging gliding mammal, the Malayan colugo (Galeopterus variegatus).

Authors:  Greg Byrnes; Norman T-L Lim; Andrew J Spence
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Morphology and function of the forelimb in arboreal frogs: specializations for grasping ability?

Authors:  Adriana S Manzano; Virginia Abdala; Anthony Herrel
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Movement in a gravitational field: The question of limb interarticular coordination in terrestrial vertebrates.

Authors:  Pierre Legreneur; Vincent Bels; Karine Monteil; Michel Laurin
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 1.890

6.  Elastic modulus of tree frog adhesive toe pads.

Authors:  W Jon P Barnes; Pablo J Perez Goodwyn; Mohsen Nokhbatolfoghahai; Stanislav N Gorb
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Do toads have a jump on how far they hop? Pre-landing activity timing and intensity in forelimb muscles of hopping Bufo marinus.

Authors:  Gary B Gillis; Trupti Akella; Rashmi Gunaratne
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Muscle performance during frog jumping: influence of elasticity on muscle operating lengths.

Authors:  Emanuel Azizi; Thomas J Roberts
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Cooperation behavior of fore- And hindlimbs during jumping in Rana dybowskii and Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Mo Li; Zibo Gao; Jili Wang; Wei Song; Qingzhu Zhang; Jin Tong; Lili Ren
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Wild cane toads (Rhinella marina) expel foreign matter from the coelom via the urinary bladder in response to internal injury, endoparasites and disease.

Authors:  Crystal Kelehear; Hugh I Jones; Benjamin A Wood; Richard Shine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.