Literature DB >> 16354384

Classification of faces in man and machine.

Arnulf B A Graf1, Felix A Wichmann, Heinrich H Bülthoff, Bernhard Schölkopf.   

Abstract

We attempt to shed light on the algorithms humans use to classify images of human faces according to their gender. For this, a novel methodology combining human psychophysics and machine learning is introduced. We proceed as follows. First, we apply principal component analysis (PCA) on the pixel information of the face stimuli. We then obtain a data set composed of these PCA eigenvectors combined with the subjects' gender estimates of the corresponding stimuli. Second, we model the gender classification process on this data set using a separating hyperplane (SH) between both classes. This SH is computed using algorithms from machine learning: the support vector machine (SVM), the relevance vector machine, the prototype classifier, and the K-means classifier. The classification behavior of humans and machines is then analyzed in three steps. First, the classification errors of humans and machines are compared for the various classifiers, and we also assess how well machines can recreate the subjects' internal decision boundary by studying the training errors of the machines. Second, we study the correlations between the rank-order of the subjects' responses to each stimulus-the gender estimate with its reaction time and confidence rating-and the rank-order of the distance of these stimuli to the SH. Finally, we attempt to compare the metric of the representations used by humans and machines for classification by relating the subjects' gender estimate of each stimulus and the distance of this stimulus to the SH. While we show that the classification error alone is not a sufficient selection criterion between the different algorithms humans might use to classify face stimuli, the distance of these stimuli to the SH is shown to capture essentials of the internal decision space of humans. Furthermore, algorithms such as the prototype classifier using stimuli in the center of the classes are shown to be less adapted to model human classification behavior than algorithms such as the SVM based on stimuli close to the boundary between the classes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16354384     DOI: 10.1162/089976606774841611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Comput        ISSN: 0899-7667            Impact factor:   2.026


  5 in total

1.  Generalization and similarity in exemplar models of categorization: insights from machine learning.

Authors:  Frank Jäkel; Bernhard Schölkopf; Felix A Wichmann
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

2.  Faces in places: humans and machines make similar face detection errors.

Authors:  Bernard Marius 't Hart; Tilman Gerrit Jakob Abresch; Wolfgang Einhäuser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Plant classification from bat-like echolocation signals.

Authors:  Yossi Yovel; Matthias Otto Franz; Peter Stilz; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Geometric facial gender scoring: objectivity of perception.

Authors:  Syed Zulqarnain Gilani; Kathleen Rooney; Faisal Shafait; Mark Walters; Ajmal Mian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  POIMs: positional oligomer importance matrices--understanding support vector machine-based signal detectors.

Authors:  Sören Sonnenburg; Alexander Zien; Petra Philips; Gunnar Rätsch
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.