Literature DB >> 16354355

Cochlear implantation in chronic otitis media.

Levent Olgun1, Caglar Batman, Gurol Gultekin, Tolga Kandogan, Ugur Cerci.   

Abstract

Chronic otitis media (COM) patients who had a multichannel device implanted were evaluated regarding surgical problems and technical modifications. In a multicentric study, implantees whose aetiology was COM were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were operated on and evaluated at three different tertiary referral centres: SSK Izmir Hospital Cochlear Implantation (CI) Center (32 cases), Istanbul Marmara University ENT Clinic (six cases), Eskişehir Anadolu University CI Center (one case). Thirty-nine implantees were evaluated with respect to surgical problems, technical modifications, complications and hearing results. All patients had lost their hearings as a result of COM. Three out of 39 cases were children. Thirty-seven of the patients either had a radical cavity or ear converted to radical at the first stage or concomittantly with the implantation. Patients were evaluated in order to find out the best possible surgical solutions to specific problems caused by COM. In seven cases electrode array disrupted the epithelial lining of the cavity despite specific measures. Five of those cases were re-implanted, passing the electrode array through a tunnel under the facial nerve. Seven recent cases were also implanted with the same subfacial route. In all patients but one, satisfactory hearing results were achieved one to five years after implantation (SDS scores with monosyllabic word list were between 59 and 89 per cent, median 67.4 per cent). CI in COM patients necessitates technical modifications. In radical cavities subfacial implantation seems to be a good solution for the protection of the electrode array.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16354355     DOI: 10.1258/002221505775010814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laryngol Otol        ISSN: 0022-2151            Impact factor:   1.469


  7 in total

1.  Adult progressive sensorineural hearing loss: is preoperative imaging necessary before cochlear implantation?

Authors:  Deanne M Roberts; Matthew L Bush; Raleigh O Jones
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  The role of subtotal petrosectomy in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Xabier Altuna; Leire García; Zuriñe Martínez; Mercedes Fernández de Pinedo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Retrofacial Approach for Cochlear Implantation in Chronic Otitis Media: A Case Report.

Authors:  Shogo Furuki; Hajime Sano; Taku Yamashita
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 1.316

4.  Cochlear implantation in chronic otitis media and previous middle ear surgery: 20 years of experience.

Authors:  V Vincenti; E Pasanisi; A Bacciu; S Bacciu; C Zini
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.124

5.  The use of subtotal petrosectomy in cochlear implant candidates with chronic otitis media.

Authors:  Marcin Szymański; Andre Ataide; Thomas Linder
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  The use of a simultaneous fascia lata-free flap with cochlear implantation after radical Mastoidectomy.

Authors:  Jason G May; John Kerr; Jack A May; Patrick Tassone; Arnaldo L Rivera
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-08-03

7.  One-stage coclear implantation via a facial recess approach in children with otitis media with effusion.

Authors:  Qing-Qing Hao; Yan Yan; Wei Ren; Guang-Yu Xu; Ri-Yuan Liu; Jia-Nan Li; Li Sun; Qing-Shan Jiao; Hui Zhao; Shi-Ming Yang
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2015-11-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.