Literature DB >> 16353926

Challenges in the transition to model-based development.

Thaddeus H Grasela1, Jill Fiedler-Kelly, Cynthia A Walawander, Joel S Owen, Brenda B Cirincione, Kathleen E Reitz, Elizabeth A Ludwig, Julie A Passarell, Charles W Dement.   

Abstract

Practitioners of the art and science of pharmacometrics are well aware of the considerable effort required to successfully complete modeling and simulation activities for drug development programs. This is particularly true because of the current, ad hoc implementation wherein modeling and simulation activities are piggybacked onto traditional development programs. This effort, coupled with the failure to explicitly design development programs around modeling and simulation, will continue to be an important obstacle to the successful transition to model-based drug development. Challenges with timely data availability, high data discard rates, delays in completing modeling and simulation activities, and resistance of development teams to the use of modeling and simulation in decision making are all symptoms of an immature process capability for performing modeling and simulation. A process that will fulfill the promise of model-based development will require the development and deployment of three critical elements. The first is the infrastructure--the data definitions and assembly processes that will allow efficient pooling of data across trials and development programs. The second is the process itself--developing guidelines for deciding when and where modeling and simulation should be applied and the criteria for assessing performance and impact. The third element concerns the organization and culture--the establishment of truly integrated, multidisciplinary, and multiorganizational development teams trained in the use of modeling and simulation in decision-making. Creating these capabilities, infrastructure, and incentivizations are critical to realizing the full value of modeling and simulation in drug development.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16353926      PMCID: PMC2750986          DOI: 10.1208/aapsj070249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  5 in total

1.  Putting a price on biotechnology.

Authors:  J J Stewart; P N Allison; R S Johnson
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  An evaluation of population pharmacokinetics in therapeutic trials. Part III. Prospective data collection versus retrospective data assembly.

Authors:  E J Antal; T H Grasela; R B Smith
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Prospective use of population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in the development of cisatracurium.

Authors:  V D Schmith; J Fiedler-Kelly; L Phillips; T H Grasela
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 4.  Learning versus confirming in clinical drug development.

Authors:  L B Sheiner
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Population pharmacokinetics of procainamide from routine clinical data.

Authors:  T H Grasela; L B Sheiner
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1984 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.447

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Informatics: the fuel for pharmacometric analysis.

Authors:  Thaddeus H Grasela; Jill Fiedler-Kelly; Brenda Cirincione; Darcy Hitchcock; Kathleen Reitz; Susanne Sardella; Barry Smith
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Concepts and challenges in quantitative pharmacology and model-based drug development.

Authors:  Liping Zhang; Marc Pfister; Bernd Meibohm
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 3.  Facilitating compound progression of antiretroviral agents via modeling and simulation.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Barrett
Journal:  J Neuroimmune Pharmacol       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  The role of multiscale computational approaches for rational design of conventional and nanoparticle oral drug delivery systems.

Authors:  Nahor Haddish-Berhane; Jenna L Rickus; Kamyar Haghighi
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2007
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.