Literature DB >> 16353270

Psychological consequences of termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: similarities and differences between partners.

Marijke J Korenromp1, Godelieve C M L Page-Christiaens, Jan van den Bout, Eduard J H Mulder, Joke A M Hunfeld, Catia M Bilardo, Jos P M Offermans, Gerard H A Visser.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We examined the psychological responses to termination of pregnancy (TOP) for fetal anomaly from both men and women. The aim was to find risk factors for poor psychological outcome both for the individuals and for the couple.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed in 151 couples 2-7 years after TOP. We used standardized and validated questionnaires to investigate grief, symptoms of posttraumatic stress, somatic complaints, anxiety, and depression.
RESULTS: Most couples adapted well to their loss, although several patients had pathological scores on posttraumatic stress symptoms and depression. Differences between men and women were slight. Higher education, good partner support, earlier gestational age, and life-incompatibility of the disorder positively influenced the outcomes, more for women than for men. Men and women with pathological scores rarely had such scores simultaneously.
CONCLUSION: We emphasize the importance of equally involving both parents in the counselling because the outcomes of grief and posttraumatic stress symptoms between men and women only moderately differ and post-TOP psychopathology occurs in men as well. Good adjustment to TOP in women seems dependent on the level of support that they perceive from their partners. The intracouple results of the study suggest a mutual influence in the process of grieving between the partners. Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16353270     DOI: 10.1002/pd.1307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  14 in total

1.  Pregnancy continuation and organizational religious activity following prenatal diagnosis of a lethal fetal defect are associated with improved psychological outcome.

Authors:  Simon Gregory; Allison Ashley-Koch; Heidi Cope; Melanie E Garrett
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 2.  Support for mothers, fathers and families after perinatal death.

Authors:  Laura Koopmans; Trish Wilson; Joanne Cacciatore; Vicki Flenady
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-19

3.  Support Desired by Women Following Termination of Pregnancy for a Fetal Anomaly.

Authors:  Aarti Ramdaney; Syed S Hashmi; Manju Monga; Rebecca Carter; Jennifer Czerwinski
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Complicated grief after traumatic loss: a 14-month follow up study.

Authors:  Anette Kersting; K Kroker; J Steinhard; K Lüdorff; U Wesselmann; P Ohrmann; V Arolt; T Suslow
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.270

5.  Prenatal genetic testing for cystic fibrosis: a systematic review of clinical effectiveness and an ethics review.

Authors:  Sharon J M Kessels; Drew Carter; Benjamin Ellery; Skye Newton; Tracy L Merlin
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 6.  Complicated grief after perinatal loss.

Authors:  Anette Kersting; Birgit Wagner
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.986

Review 7.  Posttraumatic stress and posttraumatic stress disorder after termination of pregnancy and reproductive loss: a systematic review.

Authors:  Viltė Daugirdaitė; Olga van den Akker; Satvinder Purewal
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2015-02-05

Review 8.  The impact of pregnancy loss on men's health and wellbeing: a systematic review.

Authors:  Clemence Due; Stephanie Chiarolli; Damien W Riggs
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Psychosocial aspects of preconception consultation in primary care: lessons from our experience in clinical genetics.

Authors:  S Riedijk; G Oudesluijs; A Tibben
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-05-15

10.  The decision: Relations to oneself, authority and vulnerability in the field of selective abortion.

Authors:  Sølvi Marie Risøy; Thorvald Sirnes
Journal:  Biosocieties       Date:  2015-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.