Literature DB >> 16352892

Current status of laparoscopic therapy of colorectal cancer.

H-P Bruch1, H Esnaashari, O Schwandner.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic colorectal resections offer several benefits postoperatively, including minimal impairment of gastrointestinal and pulmonary function, less immunosuppression, shorter hospital stay and improved reconvalescence. Since the introduction of laparoscopic surgery for the therapy of curable colorectal cancer, some concern was voiced in terms of oncologic radicality, the issue of port-site metastases and tumor cell distribution. However, the clinical reality has demonstrated that oncologic radicality is equivalent to open surgery, and the incidence of port-site metastases is not increased when compared to wound recurrence at the laparotomy site. Focusing on colon and rectum, various indications of laparoscopic-endoscopic 'rendezvous' procedures exist including laparoscopic-assisted endoscopic transluminal resection, endoscopic-assisted wedge or anatomical resections, and, finally, intraoperative tumor location by colonoscopy to achieve oncologic resection margins in laparoscopic curative resections. In terms of colorectal curative resections, long-term results provide level I evidence that laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer is oncologically adequate and can be performed with equivalent morbidity and mortality rates when compared to conventional surgery. In terms of rectal cancer, no level I evidence is available. However, short-term data from experienced centers do not report inferior oncologic outcome particularly related to laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. Copyright 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16352892     DOI: 10.1159/000088594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis        ISSN: 0257-2753            Impact factor:   2.404


  6 in total

1.  [Long-term oncological results after laparoscopic, converted and primary open procedures for rectal carcinoma. Results of a multicenter observational study].

Authors:  H Ptok; R Steinert; F Meyer; K-P Kröll; C Scheele; F Köckerling; I Gastinger; H Lippert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Laparoscopic colorectal resection for benign polyps not suitable for endoscopic polypectomy.

Authors:  Lena Hauenschild; Franz Georg Bader; Tilman Laubert; Ralf Czymek; Philipp Hildebrand; Uwe Johannes Roblick; Hans-Peter Bruch; Lutz Mirow
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Laparoscopic colectomy and restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Marco Vitellaro; Giuliano Bonfanti; Paola Sala; Elia Poiasina; Marta Barisella; Stefano Signoroni; Andrea Mancini; Lucio Bertario
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: oncological results and clinical outcome of 225 patients.

Authors:  Ayman Agha; Alois Fürst; Johanna Hierl; Igors Iesalnieks; Gabriel Glockzin; Matthias Anthuber; Karl-Walter Jauch; Hans J Schlitt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic TME in rectal cancer--electronic supplementary: op-video.

Authors:  Alois Fürst; Oliver Schwandner; Arthur Heiligensetzer; Igors Iesalnieks; Ayman Agha
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Abstracts from the 26th National Congress of the Italian Society of Geriatric Surgery, 19-22 June 2013, Naples, Italy.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.