Literature DB >> 16352871

On-line haemodiafiltration versus haemodialysis: stable haematocrit with less erythropoietin and improvement of other relevant blood parameters.

Lajos Vaslaki1, Lajos Major, Klara Berta, Andras Karatson, Mihay Misz, Ferenc Pethoe, Erzsebet Ladanyi, Bertalan Fodor, Gunter Stein, Monika Pischetsrieder, Thomas Zima, Ralf Wojke, Adelheid Gauly, Jutta Passlick-Deetjen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Controlled randomised studies to prove improved cardiovascular stability and improved anaemia management during on-line haemodiafiltration (oHDF) are scarce.
METHODS: 70 patients were treated with both haemodialysis (HD) and oHDF in a cross-over design during 2 x 24 weeks at a dialysis dose of eKt/V> or =1.2. Patients randomised into group A started on HD and switched over to oHDF, whereas patients in group B began with oHDF and were treated with HD afterwards. Intradialytic morbid events (IME), such as symptomatic hypotension or muscle cramps, were noted in case of appearance. Blood parameters reflecting anaemic status, phosphate status, lipid metabolism, oxidative stress, and accumulation of advanced glycation end products were recorded either monthly or at the end of each study phase.
RESULTS: The mean incidence of IME was 0.15 IME per treatment, and there was no statistical difference between oHDF and HD. A higher haematocrit (oHDF 31.5% vs. HD 30.5%, p < 0.01) at a lower erythropoietin dose (oHDF 4,913 vs. HD 5,492 IU/week, p = 0.02) was found during oHDF, when the sequence of HD and oHDF had not been taken into account. For the study groups, the results were less distinct: in group A, a higher haematocrit (HD 30.4% vs. oHDF 32.0%, p < 0.01) at a comparable erythropoietin dose (HD 5,421 vs. oHDF 5,187 IU/week, ns) was observed during oHDF, whereas in group B an identical haematocrit (oHDF 30.8% vs. HD 30.7%, ns) was achieved at a reduced erythropoietin dose (oHDF 4,622 vs. HD 5,568 IU/week, p < 0.01). During oHDF, lower levels of free and protein-bound pentosidine and of serum phosphate were found.
CONCLUSION: In contrast to other studies, no benefit regarding cardiovascular stability for oHDF was found, but oHDF could well offer a potential benefit regarding anaemia correction, inflammation, oxidative stress, lipid profiles, and calcium-phosphate product. (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16352871     DOI: 10.1159/000090117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Purif        ISSN: 0253-5068            Impact factor:   2.614


  11 in total

1.  Subjective Global Assessment-Dialysis Malnutrition Score and cardiovascular risk in hemodialysis patients: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  Leonardo Spatola; Silvia Finazzi; Albania Calvetta; Francesco Reggiani; Emanuela Morenghi; Silvia Santostasi; Claudio Angelini; Salvatore Badalamenti; Giacomo Mugnai
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 3.902

2.  Variation of clinical and laboratory features in chronic dialysis patients treated with high-flux hemodialysis after switching to online hemodiafiltration.

Authors:  Remus Aurel Orasan; Ioan Mihai Patiu; Daniela Anghel; Cezarina Bejan; Ligia Iosub; Camelia Totolici; Mariana Pop; Carmen Turcea; Cristina Teodoru; Olga Hilda Orasan; Ina Maria Kacso; Mirela Gherman Caprioara
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Long-term outcomes in online hemodiafiltration and high-flux hemodialysis: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Enric Vilar; Andrew C Fry; David Wellsted; James E Tattersall; Roger N Greenwood; Ken Farrington
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Hemodiafiltration improves plasma 25-hepcidin levels: a prospective, randomized, blinded, cross-over study comparing hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration.

Authors:  Bergur V Stefánsson; Mats Abramson; Ulf Nilsson; Börje Haraldsson
Journal:  Nephron Extra       Date:  2012-03-28

5.  Predictors of haemoglobin levels and resistance to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients treated with low-flux haemodialysis, haemofiltration and haemodiafiltration: results of a multicentre randomized and controlled trial.

Authors:  Francesco Locatelli; Paolo Altieri; Simeone Andrulli; Giovanna Sau; Piergiorgio Bolasco; Luciano A Pedrini; Carlo Basile; Salvatore David; Mariano Feriani; Pier Eugenio Nebiolo; Rocco Ferrara; Domenica Casu; Francesco Logias; Renzo Tarchini; Francesco Cadinu; Mario Passaghe; Gianfranco Fundoni; Giuseppe Villa; Biagio Raffaele Di Iorio; Carmine Zoccali
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 6.  Genomic damage in endstage renal disease-contribution of uremic toxins.

Authors:  Nicole Schupp; August Heidland; Helga Stopper
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 4.546

7.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of High-Efficiency Hemodiafiltration Versus Low-Flux Hemodialysis Based on the Canadian Arm of the CONTRAST Study.

Authors:  Renee Lévesque; Daniele Marcelli; Héloïse Cardinal; Marie-Line Caron; Muriel P C Grooteman; Michiel L Bots; Peter J Blankestijn; Menso J Nubé; Aileen Grassmann; Bernard Canaud; Afschin Gandjour
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.561

8.  Effects of high-volume online mixed-hemodiafiltration on anemia management in dialysis patients.

Authors:  Luciano A Pedrini; Adam M Zawada; Anke C Winter; Jenny Pham; Gudrun Klein; Melanie Wolf; Astrid Feuersenger; Pio Ruggiero; Annalisa Feliciani; Carlo Barbieri; Adelheid Gauly; Bernard Canaud; Stefano Stuard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Resistance to erythropoiesis stimulating agents in patients treated with online hemodiafiltration and ultrapure low-flux hemodialysis: results from a randomized controlled trial (CONTRAST).

Authors:  Neelke C van der Weerd; Claire H Den Hoedt; Peter J Blankestijn; Michiel L Bots; Marinus A van den Dorpel; Renée Lévesque; Albert H A Mazairac; Menso J Nubé; E Lars Penne; Pieter M ter Wee; Muriel P C Grooteman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Restitution volumes at the end of dialysis sessions: A potential influencing factor on patients' haemoglobin levels?

Authors:  Joao Fazendeiro Matos; Ricardo Peralta; Carla Felix; Bruno Pinto; Pedro Goncalves; Vera Carlos; Ricardo Rodrigues; Maria Teresa Parisotto; Maria João Carvalho; Pedro Ponce
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2019-09-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.