Literature DB >> 16352626

Delayed detection of cleft palate: an audit of newborn examination.

A Habel1, N Elhadi, B Sommerlad, J Powell.   

Abstract

AIMS: To identify prevalence of delayed detection of cleft palate, and associated factors that could lead to improved identification at neonatal clinical examination.
METHODS: Audit of hospital notes, parental questionnaire incorporating open ended questions, and telephone questionnaire of junior doctors in the referring hospitals incorporating fixed choice questions.
RESULTS: Of 344 cleft palate patients without cleft lip or submucous cleft palate, the day the cleft was detected was recorded in 92%. Delayed detection, after the first day, was 28% overall, distributed as 37% with isolated cleft palate and 23% with syndromic cleft palate. Narrow V shaped clefts were more likely to be delayed in detection compared with broad U shaped clefts, as were soft palate clefts compared with hard palate clefts. Five with isolated cleft palates were not detected until after the first year. Babies born at home were unlikely to be detected on day 1. Symptoms were significantly increased in the delayed detection group for feeding problems and nasal regurgitation. A telephone questionnaire of trainee paediatricians in referring units revealed that digital examination was more commonly practised than visual inspection, and few recalled receiving specific instruction on examination of the palate.
CONCLUSION: Delayed detection of cleft palate was not uncommon, and the features of those more likely to be missed suggested digital examination was related. Trainee doctors and midwives should be instructed to inspect visually using a light and tongue depressor, then digitally if submucous cleft palate is suspected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16352626      PMCID: PMC2065953          DOI: 10.1136/adc.2005.077958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  4 in total

1.  Examination of the neonatal palate.

Authors:  H Armstrong; R M Simpson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  A national survey of screening for congenital dislocation of the hip.

Authors:  C Dezateux; S Godward
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Associated malformations in cases with oral clefts.

Authors:  C Stoll; Y Alembik; B Dott; M P Roth
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2000-01

4.  Prevalence and clinical significance of cardiac murmurs in neonates.

Authors:  S Ainsworth; J P Wyllie; C Wren
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.747

  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Late detection of cleft palate.

Authors:  K H Hanny; I A C de Vries; S J Haverkamp; K P Q Oomen; W M Penris; M J C Eijkemans; M Kon; A B Mink van der Molen; C C Breugem
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Clinical outcomes of prenatal diagnosis of the fetal micrognathia: A case report.

Authors:  Jin-Wen Lu; Dan Lu; Xiao-Li Zhang; Jiao Bai
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 3.  Diagnostic accuracy of fetal MRI to detect cleft palate: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hanneke E M van der Hoek-Snieders; Antonius J M L van den Heuvel; Harmieke van Os-Medendorp; Digna M A Kamalski
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Age at Primary Cleft Lip Repair: A Potential Bellwether Indicator for Pediatric Surgery.

Authors:  Richard Vanderburg; Nivaldo Alonso; Priya Desai; Peter Donkor; Peter Mossey; Erin Stieber; Felicity V Mehendale
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-06-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.