BACKGROUND: Diastolic heart failure (DHF) is reported to account for 30-50% of heart failure presentations, but its prevalence in the absence of overt coronary disease is unclear. Diastolic heart failure is usually defined by exclusion (heart failure with normal left ventricular (LV) systolic function), and few studies have sought a specific diagnosis of diastolic dysfunction. The objective of the present study was to determine the prevalence of isolated DHF and characterise LV diastolic function in patients without clinical evidence of coronary disease, who were referred for LV function assessment. METHODS: Among 938 consecutive patients referred for assessment of LV function, diastolic dysfunction was sought in patients with clinical heart failure, normal systolic function, and no valvular or coronary disease. The evaluation was based on measurement of early (E) and late (A) transmitral velocities and E wave deceleration time (DT). Pulmonary vein systolic, diastolic and atrial reversal velocities were used to differentiate pseudonormal filling in patients with normal E/A and DT. RESULTS: Normal LV systolic function was present in 331 patients (35%), of whom 53 (6%) met criteria for a clinical diagnosis of DHF. Diastolic dysfunction was confirmed by echocardiography in 38 patients (72% of clinical DHF patients), of whom 27 had impaired LV relaxation, 10 had pseudonormal filling, and one had restrictive filling. Diastolic function was normal in 13 and indeterminate in two patients. Pseudonormal or restrictive LV filling were more prevalent in patients with acute heart failure (7/20, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Carefully defined, isolated DHF is uncommon, but most of these patients demonstrate echocardiographic evidence of diastolic dysfunction.
BACKGROUND:Diastolic heart failure (DHF) is reported to account for 30-50% of heart failure presentations, but its prevalence in the absence of overt coronary disease is unclear. Diastolic heart failure is usually defined by exclusion (heart failure with normal left ventricular (LV) systolic function), and few studies have sought a specific diagnosis of diastolic dysfunction. The objective of the present study was to determine the prevalence of isolated DHF and characterise LV diastolic function in patients without clinical evidence of coronary disease, who were referred for LV function assessment. METHODS: Among 938 consecutive patients referred for assessment of LV function, diastolic dysfunction was sought in patients with clinical heart failure, normal systolic function, and no valvular or coronary disease. The evaluation was based on measurement of early (E) and late (A) transmitral velocities and E wave deceleration time (DT). Pulmonary vein systolic, diastolic and atrial reversal velocities were used to differentiate pseudonormal filling in patients with normal E/A and DT. RESULTS: Normal LV systolic function was present in 331 patients (35%), of whom 53 (6%) met criteria for a clinical diagnosis of DHF. Diastolic dysfunction was confirmed by echocardiography in 38 patients (72% of clinical DHF patients), of whom 27 had impaired LV relaxation, 10 had pseudonormal filling, and one had restrictive filling. Diastolic function was normal in 13 and indeterminate in two patients. Pseudonormal or restrictive LV filling were more prevalent in patients with acute heart failure (7/20, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Carefully defined, isolated DHF is uncommon, but most of these patients demonstrate echocardiographic evidence of diastolic dysfunction.