Literature DB >> 16351903

Role of chemical and visual cues in food recognition by leatherback posthatchlings (Dermochelys coriacea L).

Maricela A Constantino1, Michael Salmon.   

Abstract

We raised leatherback posthatchlings in the laboratory for up to 7 weeks to study the role of visual and chemical cues in food recognition and food-seeking behavior. Turtles were reared on a formulated (artificial gelatinous) diet and had no contact with test materials until experiments began. Subjects were presented with visual cues (a plastic jellyfish; white plastic shapes [circle, square, diamond] similar in surface area to the plastic model), chemical cues (homogenates of lion's mane jellyfish, Cyanea capillata; moon jellyfish, Aurelia aurita; and a ctenophore, Ocyropsis sp., introduced through a water filter outflow), and visual and chemical cues presented simultaneously. Visual stimuli evoked an increase in swimming activity, biting, diving, and orientation toward the object. Chemical cues elicited an increase in biting, and orientation into water currents (rheotaxis). When chemical and visual stimuli were combined, turtles ignored currents and oriented toward the visual stimuli. We conclude that both cues are used to search for, and locate, food but that visual cues may be of primary importance. We hypothesize that under natural conditions turtles locate food visually, then, as a consequence of feeding, associate chemical with visual cues. Chemical cues then may function alone as a feeding attractant.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 16351903     DOI: 10.1078/0944-2006-00114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoology (Jena)        ISSN: 0944-2006            Impact factor:   2.240


  8 in total

Review 1.  Olfaction of aquatic amniotes.

Authors:  Takushi Kishida
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.249

2.  Accidental bait: do deceased fish increase freshwater turtle bycatch in commercial fyke nets?

Authors:  Sarah M Larocque; Paige Watson; Gabriel Blouin-Demers; Steven J Cooke
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  To eat or not to eat? Debris selectivity by marine turtles.

Authors:  Qamar Schuyler; Britta Denise Hardesty; Chris Wilcox; Kathy Townsend
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Resource requirements of the Pacific leatherback turtle population.

Authors:  T Todd Jones; Brian L Bostrom; Mervin D Hastings; Kyle S Van Houtan; Daniel Pauly; David R Jones
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) use vision to forage on gelatinous prey in mid-water.

Authors:  Tomoko Narazaki; Katsufumi Sato; Kyler J Abernathy; Greg J Marshall; Nobuyuki Miyazaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Persistent leatherback turtle migrations present opportunities for conservation.

Authors:  George L Shillinger; Daniel M Palacios; Helen Bailey; Steven J Bograd; Alan M Swithenbank; Philippe Gaspar; Bryan P Wallace; James R Spotila; Frank V Paladino; Rotney Piedra; Scott A Eckert; Barbara A Block
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Mistaken identity? Visual similarities of marine debris to natural prey items of sea turtles.

Authors:  Qamar A Schuyler; Chris Wilcox; Kathy Townsend; B Denise Hardesty; N Justin Marshall
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 2.964

8.  Multi-Modal Homing in Sea Turtles: Modeling Dual Use of Geomagnetic and Chemical Cues in Island-Finding.

Authors:  Courtney S Endres; Nathan F Putman; David A Ernst; Jessica A Kurth; Catherine M F Lohmann; Kenneth J Lohmann
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.558

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.