Literature DB >> 16351028

Analysis of diagnostic error in paid malpractice claims with substandard care in a large healthcare system.

Thomas V Holohan1, Janice Colestro, John Grippi, Jane Converse, Michael Hughes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although claims databases are not representative of all care delivery, their predisposition toward serious unintended injury can complement resource-intensive chart reviews and guide patient safety initiatives.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Non-Veterans Health Administration (VA) practitioners reviewed 1,949 VA malpractice claims paid during fiscal years 1998 through 2003. The portion associated with substandard care, the severity of harm, and types of negligence were identified.
RESULTS: Negligent adverse events occurred in 37% (n = 723) of paid VA malpractice claims. These had high proportions of serious injury (55%) and morbidity (37%). Diagnostic negligent adverse events were most frequent (45%) and with 41% associated morbidity. The annual incidence of diagnosis-related paid VA malpractice claims was 1.95 per 100,000 patients and predicts that 122 of every 100,000 patients may have diagnostic negligent adverse events. Comparisons against non-VA data suggest this to be a healthcare industry problem.
CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis-related negligent adverse events are a serious problem in the healthcare industry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16351028     DOI: 10.1097/01.smj.0000170729.51651.f7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  South Med J        ISSN: 0038-4348            Impact factor:   0.954


  7 in total

1.  Patient Preferences for Test Result Notification.

Authors:  Samuel K Shultz; Robert Wu; John J Matelski; Xin Lu; Peter Cram
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Errors of diagnosis in pediatric practice: a multisite survey.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Eric J Thomas; Lindsey Wilson; P Adam Kelly; Kenneth Pietz; Dena Elkeeb; Geeta Singhal
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Exploring situational awareness in diagnostic errors in primary care.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Traber Davis Giardina; Laura A Petersen; Michael W Smith; Lindsey Wilson Paul; Key Dismukes; Gayathri Bhagwath; Eric J Thomas
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 7.035

4.  Duplicate patient records--implication for missed laboratory results.

Authors:  Erel Joffe; Charles F Bearden; Michael J Byrne; Elmer V Bernstam
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2012-11-03

5.  Differential Diagnosis Assessment in Ambulatory Care With an Automated Medical History-Taking Device: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Adrien Jean-Pierre Schwitzguebel; Clarisse Jeckelmann; Charles Benaïm; Hervé Spechbach; Roberto Gavinio; Cécile Levallois
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2019-11-04

6.  Patient- and system-related barriers for the earlier diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Terry L Wahls; Ika Peleg
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  The frequency of missed test results and associated treatment delays in a highly computerized health system.

Authors:  Terry L Wahls; Peter M Cram
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 2.497

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.