Literature DB >> 16350975

Neurophysiological correlates of persistent vegetative and minimally conscious states.

Erik J Kobylarz1, Nicholas D Schiff.   

Abstract

The evaluation of patients after severe brain injury is a complex process for the clinician, even with the information provided by a detailed neurological examination. The clinical examination often does not provide sufficient information to fully evaluate these patients due to several factors. Limited and inconsistent motor responses may obscure expression of greater cognitive capacities. More importantly, evaluation of the functional integrity of the cerebral cortical, thalamic and basal ganglia system is poorly indicated by the clinical examination in many patients. Neurophysiological studies provide a complementary set of objective data for evaluating brain-injured patients, as well as predicting and following the course of their recovery. This additional information can be of great importance since vegetative patients may be difficult to distinguish clinically from those in the minimally conscious state. This is important because the latter category of patients may have a significantly better prognosis for recovery in the initial phase of injury. Electrodiagnostic and imaging studies can help the practitioner to determine the degree of preserved and recovering neurological function. In this review we will assess the various neurophysiological studies currently at our disposal to evaluate and follow the clinical course of patients who have suffered severe brain injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16350975     DOI: 10.1080/09602010443000605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil        ISSN: 0960-2011            Impact factor:   2.868


  7 in total

Review 1.  Consciousness: its neurobiology and the major classes of impairment.

Authors:  Andrew M Goldfine; Nicholas D Schiff
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 2.  Recovery of consciousness after brain injury: a mesocircuit hypothesis.

Authors:  Nicholas D Schiff
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 3.  Disorders of consciousness after acquired brain injury: the state of the science.

Authors:  Joseph T Giacino; Joseph J Fins; Steven Laureys; Nicholas D Schiff
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 4.  How should functional imaging of patients with disorders of consciousness contribute to their clinical rehabilitation needs?

Authors:  Steven Laureys; Joseph T Giacino; Nicholas D Schiff; Manuel Schabus; Adrian M Owen
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.710

Review 5.  Diagnostic Developments in Differentiating Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome and the Minimally Conscious State.

Authors:  Camillo Porcaro; Idan Efim Nemirovsky; Francesco Riganello; Zahra Mansour; Antonio Cerasa; Paolo Tonin; Bobby Stojanoski; Andrea Soddu
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 6.  How general anesthetics work: from the perspective of reorganized connections within the brain.

Authors:  Teo Jeon Shin; Pil-Jong Kim; Bernard Choi
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-02-08

7.  CRS-R score in disorders of consciousness is strongly related to spectral EEG at rest.

Authors:  Julia Lechinger; Kathrin Bothe; Gerald Pichler; Gabriele Michitsch; Johann Donis; Wolfgang Klimesch; Manuel Schabus
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 6.682

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.