Literature DB >> 1634918

Prognostic significance of progesterone receptor levels in estrogen receptor-positive patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with tamoxifen: results of a prospective Southwest Oncology Group study.

P M Ravdin1, S Green, T M Dorr, W L McGuire, C Fabian, R P Pugh, R D Carter, S E Rivkin, J R Borst, R J Belt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) protocol 8228 is a prospective trial designed to investigate the prognostic significance of progesterone receptor (PgR) levels in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer patients who were treated with tamoxifen. This study was undertaken because the value of PgR measurements in advanced breast cancer had been assessed previously only in studies that were small, retrospective, or included heterogeneously treated patients.
METHODS: Receptor assays were performed only in the laboratories that met strict quality control guidelines. Of the 398 patients entered, 342 patients were eligible and assessable for the study end points of objective clinical response, time to treatment failure, and overall survival.
RESULTS: Multivariate analysis shows that elevated PgR levels significantly and independently correlated with increased probability of response to tamoxifen, longer time to treatment failure, and longer overall survival. Overall response rate (defined as complete response [CR], partial response [PR], or stable disease [SD] for greater than 6 months) in this trial was 54%. Response rates to tamoxifen were 43%, 53%, and 61% in subsets of patients with less than 10, 10 to 99, and more than 100 fmol/mg PgR, respectively. Exploratory subset analysis using PgR and other prognostic variables identified ER-positive patient subsets with response rates to tamoxifen ranging from 24% (premenopausal patients) to 86% (postmenopausal patients with ER greater than 38 and PgR greater than 329 fmol/mg). No groups of ER-positive patients were identified who had such a low response rate as to absolutely preclude considering the use of tamoxifen. Multivariate analysis showed the independent, statistically significant predictors were: for response to tamoxifen, menopausal status, PgR, and ER; for time to treatment failure, menopausal status, disease-free interval (DFI), PgR, and ER; and for overall survival DFI, PgR, ER, site of disease, and history of adjuvant therapy.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that knowledge of PgR levels together with other clinical information can improve the pretreatment assessment of ER-positive breast cancer patients with metastatic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1634918     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.8.1284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  68 in total

Review 1.  Minireview: Inflammation: an instigator of more aggressive estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancers.

Authors:  Sarah C Baumgarten; Jonna Frasor
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2012-02-02

Review 2.  Melatonin: an inhibitor of breast cancer.

Authors:  Steven M Hill; Victoria P Belancio; Robert T Dauchy; Shulin Xiang; Samantha Brimer; Lulu Mao; Adam Hauch; Peter W Lundberg; Whitney Summers; Lin Yuan; Tripp Frasch; David E Blask
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 5.678

3.  Current Biomarkers for Precision Medicine in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Soo Kyung Ahn; So-Youn Jung
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Circadian and melatonin disruption by exposure to light at night drives intrinsic resistance to tamoxifen therapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Robert T Dauchy; Shulin Xiang; Lulu Mao; Samantha Brimer; Melissa A Wren; Lin Yuan; Muralidharan Anbalagan; Adam Hauch; Tripp Frasch; Brian G Rowan; David E Blask; Steven M Hill
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  Prognosis and prediction of response in breast cancer: the current role of the main biological markers.

Authors:  A Ravaioli; L Bagli; A Zucchini; F Monti
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  1998 Jun-Aug       Impact factor: 6.831

6.  Breast cancer survival by molecular subtype: a population-based analysis of cancer registry data.

Authors:  Saber Fallahpour; Tanya Navaneelan; Prithwish De; Alessia Borgo
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-09-25

7.  Epidermal growth factor receptor expression in breast cancer association with biologic phenotype and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Mothaffar F Rimawi; Priya B Shetty; Heidi L Weiss; Rachel Schiff; C Kent Osborne; Gary C Chamness; Richard M Elledge
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Intrinsic subtypes and genomic signatures of primary breast cancer and prognosis after systemic relapse.

Authors:  Claudette Falato; Nicholas P Tobin; Julie Lorent; Linda S Lindström; Jonas Bergh; Theodoros Foukakis
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 6.603

9.  Potential prognostic value of heat-shock protein 90 in the presence of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase overexpression or loss of PTEN, in invasive breast cancers.

Authors:  Chang Hoon Song; So Yeon Park; Keun-Yong Eom; Jee Hyun Kim; Sung-Won Kim; Jae Sung Kim; In Ah Kim
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Maximum growth and survival of estrogen receptor-alpha positive breast cancer cells requires the Sin3A transcriptional repressor.

Authors:  Stephanie J Ellison-Zelski; Elaine T Alarid
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 27.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.