| Literature DB >> 16348769 |
T M Warren1, V Williams, M Fletcher.
Abstract
Microcosm studies were performed to evaluate the effect of solid surfaces, bacterial adhesive ability, and inoculum size on colonization success and persistence of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Xanthomonas maltophilia, each with a Tn5 insertion that conferred resistance to kanamycin and streptomycin. Two types of microcosms were used: (i) a simple system that was colonized by Aeromonas hydrophila and a coryneform and (ii) a complex system produced from lake water enrichment cultures. Simple microcosms contained 100 ml of peptone- and yeast extract-supplemented artificial lake water or 60 ml of peptone- and yeast extract-supplemented artificial lake water with 70 g of 3-mm glass beads. Complex microcosms contained 100 ml of lake water with no nutrient additions or 100 ml of lake water with 70 g of glass beads. The microcosms were incubated for 35 days at 20 degrees C. In lake water enrichment microcosms, the presence of beads increased the abilities of P. fluorescens or X. maltophilia to colonize, but their numbers decreased with time in microcosms both with and without beads. The adhesiveness of the bacteria, measured in an in vitro assay, did not relate to colonization success. In simple microcosms, the inoculum size (10, 10, or 10) of P. fluorescens did not influence colonization success. However, in complex microcosms, an inoculum of 10 cells was insufficient to ensure colonization by P. fluorescens, while 10 cells resulted in colonization of liquid and beads. Simple microcosm studies, utilizing only a few species, were poor models for complex natural systems. In complex enrichment systems, colonization of surfaces resulted in higher numbers of organisms but did not noticeably promote persistence. Adhesiveness of a particular organism may be a relatively minor factor influencing its ability to colonize solid surfaces in complex natural environments.Entities:
Year: 1992 PMID: 16348769 PMCID: PMC183032 DOI: 10.1128/aem.58.9.2954-2959.1992
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol ISSN: 0099-2240 Impact factor: 4.792