Literature DB >> 16348292

Growth of Octopine-Catabolizing Pseudomonas spp. under Octopine Limitation in Chemostats and Their Potential To Compete with Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

C R Bell1, L W Moore, M L Canfield.   

Abstract

The growth characteristics of five octopine-catabolizing pseudomonads have been determined in batch and continuous cultures. All five strains belonged to rRNA homology group I and showed a more psychrotrophic growth pattern than did Agrobacterium tumefaciens B6 and ATCC 15955. In chemostats limited by octopine, either as the source of carbon and nitrogen or the sole source of nitrogen, maximum specific growth rates and substrate affinities were lower than those in chemostats limited by glutamate. These growth dynamics were similar to those observed for Agrobacterium strains B6 and ATCC 15955 even though the catabolic genes and pathways are believed to be different in the two genera. An analysis of the yields in octopine-limited chemostats indicated that the use of octopine as the sole source of carbon and nitrogen was grossly inefficient. Octopine and presumably lysopine and octopinic acid provided a better source of nitrogen than of carbon. One of the Pseudomonas fluorescens strains, E175D, was able to produce its highest yield on octopine as a nitrogen source. Competition models formulated on pure culture parameters indicated that two of the Pseudomonas spp. would dominate A. tumefaciens B6 and ATCC 15955 when in simple competition for octopine as a limiting substrate.

Entities:  

Year:  1990        PMID: 16348292      PMCID: PMC184851          DOI: 10.1128/aem.56.9.2834-2839.1990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  22 in total

1.  Degradation of lysopine by an inducible membrane-bound oxidase in Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

Authors:  M -F. Jubier
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1972-12-01       Impact factor: 4.124

2.  Competition of Octopine-Catabolizing Pseudomonas spp. and Octopine-Type Agrobacterium tumefaciens for Octopine in Chemostats.

Authors:  C R Bell; N E Cummings; M L Canfield; L W Moore
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Selection in chemostats.

Authors:  D E Dykhuizen; D L Hartl
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1983-06

4.  Genetic map of an octopine TI-plasmid.

Authors:  B P Koekman; G Ooms; P M Klapwijk; R A Schilperoort
Journal:  Plasmid       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  Genetic analysis of mannityl opine catabolism in octopine-type Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain 15955.

Authors:  Y Dessaux; J Tempé; S K Farrand
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1987-06

6.  Agropine in "null-type" crown gall tumors: Evidence for generality of the opine concept.

Authors:  P Guyon; M D Chilton; A Petit; J Tempé
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  L-arginine utilization by Pseudomonas species.

Authors:  V Stalon; A Mercenier
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1984-01

8.  Oxidation of D-amino acids by a particulate enzyme from Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  V P Marshall; J R Sokatch
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1968-04       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Opine utilization by Agrobacterium spp.: octopine-type Ti plasmids encode two pathways for mannopinic acid degradation.

Authors:  Y Dessaux; P Guyon; A Petit; J Tempé; M Demarez; C Legrain; M E Tate; S K Farrand
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Succinamopine: a new crown gall opine.

Authors:  W S Chilton; J Tempé; M Matzke; M D Chilton
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  3 in total

1.  Competition of Octopine-Catabolizing Pseudomonas spp. and Octopine-Type Agrobacterium tumefaciens for Octopine in Chemostats.

Authors:  C R Bell; N E Cummings; M L Canfield; L W Moore
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Diversity of opines and opine-catabolizing bacteria isolated from naturally occurring crown gall tumors.

Authors:  L W Moore; W S Chilton; M L Canfield
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Grapevine (Vitis vinifera) Crown Galls Host Distinct Microbiota.

Authors:  Hanna Faist; Alexander Keller; Ute Hentschel; Rosalia Deeken
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 4.792

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.