Literature DB >> 16348149

Die-away kinetic analysis of the capacity of epilithic and planktonic bacteria from clean and polluted river water to biodegrade sodium dodecyl sulfate.

D J Anderson1, M J Day, N J Russell, G F White.   

Abstract

The capacities of epilithic and planktonic river bacterial populations to degrade sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in samples taken at two times during 1987 from one clean and four polluted sites in a South Wales river were estimated in die-away tests under simulated environmental conditions. There was a relatively slow disappearance of SDS in die-away tests for both planktonic and epilithic populations taken from the clean source site, as compared with those taken from the downstream polluted sites, for which the rate of biodegradation was accelerated, sometimes after an apparent initial lag period. The kinetic components contributing to the die-away curves were quantified by nonlinear regression analysis in which the experimental data were fitted to a variety of possible kinetic models. All samples except for one from the polluted sites best fitted a model which describes the biodegradation of SDS at concentrations well below its K(m) by bacteria whose growth is exponential and unaffected by the addition of a test substrate. Each sample from the clean source site fitted a different model, but there was generally little or no growth on endogenous carbon. A consideration of the numerical values of constants derived from the modeling of epilithic and planktonic populations from polluted sites indicated clearly that the biodegradative capacity of epilithic bacterial populations towards SDS is more stable than that of planktonic bacterial populations.

Entities:  

Year:  1990        PMID: 16348149      PMCID: PMC183417          DOI: 10.1128/aem.56.3.758-763.1990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  8 in total

Review 1.  Classical and postclassical modes of regulation of the synthesis of degradative bacterial enzymes.

Authors:  B Magasanik
Journal:  Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol       Date:  1976

2.  A rapid determination of sodium dodecyl sulfate with methylene blue.

Authors:  K Hayashi
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 3.365

3.  Temporal and geographical distributions of epilithic sodium dodecyl sulfate-degrading bacteria in a polluted South Wales river.

Authors:  D J Anderson; M J Day; N J Russell; G F White
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Adaptation to and biodegradation of xenobiotic compounds by microbial communities from a pristine aquifer.

Authors:  C M Aelion; C M Swindoll; F K Pfaender
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Metabolic pathway for the biodegradation of sodium dodecyl sulfate by Pseudomonas sp. C12B.

Authors:  O R Thomas; G F White
Journal:  Biotechnol Appl Biochem       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  Models for the kinetics of biodegradation of organic compounds not supporting growth.

Authors:  S K Schmidt; S Simkins; M Alexander
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Distribution of planktonic bacteria capable of degrading sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) in a polluted South Wales river.

Authors:  G F White; D J Anderson; M J Day; N J Russell
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 8.071

8.  Models for mineralization kinetics with the variables of substrate concentration and population density.

Authors:  S Simkins; M Alexander
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 4.792

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Colonization of biofilms by bacteria capable of biodegrading sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) at clean and polluted riverine sites.

Authors:  N J Russell; D J Anderson; M J Day; G F White
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.552

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.