Literature DB >> 1634780

Cross-protection against influenza virus infection afforded by trivalent inactivated vaccines inoculated intranasally with cholera toxin B subunit.

S Tamura1, Y Ito, H Asanuma, Y Hirabayashi, Y Suzuki, T Nagamine, C Aizawa, T Kurata.   

Abstract

Cross-protection against influenza virus infection was examined in mice, immunized intranasally with a nasal site-restricted volume of inactivated vaccines together with cholera toxin B subunit (CTB) as an adjuvant. The mice were challenged with either a small or a large volume of mouse-adapted virus suspension, each of which gave virgin mice either a predominant upper or lower respiratory tract infection. A single dose of a monovalent influenza A H3N2 virus vaccine with CTB provided complete cross-protection against the small-volume challenge with a drift virus within the same subtype, but a slight cross-protection against the large-volume challenge. A second dose of another drift virus vaccine increased the efficacy of cross-protection against the large-volume challenge. Similar cross-protection against H1N1, H3N2, or B type drift virus challenge was provided in the mice having received a primary dose of a mixture of H1N1, H3N2, and B virus vaccines with CTB and a second dose of another trivalent vaccine. The degree of cross-protection against the small- and the large-volume infection paralleled mainly the amount of cross-reacting IgA antibodies to challenge virus hemagglutinin in the nasal wash and that of cross-reacting IgG antibodies in the bronchoalveolar wash, respectively. On the other hand, in mice immunized subcutaneously with the trivalent vaccines having no cross-reacting IgA antibodies, the efficacy of cross-protection was not so high as that of nasal vaccination. These results suggest that the nasal inoculation of trivalent vaccines with CTB provides cross-protection against a broader range of viruses than does the current parenteral vaccination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1634780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol        ISSN: 0022-1767            Impact factor:   5.422


  42 in total

1.  Targeted salivary gland immunization with plasmid DNA elicits specific salivary immunoglobulin A and G antibodies and serum immunoglobulin G antibodies in mice.

Authors:  S Kawabata; Y Terao; T Fujiwara; I Nakagawa; S Hamada
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Interleukin-1 family cytokines as mucosal vaccine adjuvants for induction of protective immunity against influenza virus.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kayamuro; Yasuo Yoshioka; Yasuhiro Abe; Shuhei Arita; Kazufumi Katayama; Tetsuya Nomura; Tomoaki Yoshikawa; Ritsuko Kubota-Koketsu; Kazuyoshi Ikuta; Shigefumi Okamoto; Yasuko Mori; Jun Kunisawa; Hiroshi Kiyono; Norio Itoh; Kazuya Nagano; Haruhiko Kamada; Yasuo Tsutsumi; Shin-ichi Tsunoda
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Mucosally induced immunoglobulin E-associated inflammation in the respiratory tract.

Authors:  J W Simecka; R J Jackson; H Kiyono; J R McGhee
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Evaluation of anti-influenza effects of camostat in mice infected with non-adapted human influenza viruses.

Authors:  M G Lee; K H Kim; K Y Park; J S Kim
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.574

5.  Intranasal immunization with inactivated influenza virus enhances immune responses to coadministered simian-human immunodeficiency virus-like particle antigens.

Authors:  Sang-Moo Kang; Lizheng Guo; Qizhi Yao; Ioanna Skountzou; Richard W Compans
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Recombinant cholera toxin B subunit is not an effective mucosal adjuvant for oral immunization of mice against Helicobacter felis.

Authors:  T G Blanchard; N Lycke; S J Czinn; J G Nedrud
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 7.397

7.  Receptor-destroying enzyme (RDE) from Vibrio cholerae modulates IgE activity and reduces the initiation of anaphylaxis.

Authors:  Tatsuya Yamazaki; Masanori Inui; Keiko Hiemori; Susumu Tomono; Makoto Itoh; Isao Ichimonji; Akina Nakashima; Hidekazu Takagi; Mrityunjoy Biswas; Kumi Izawa; Jiro Kitaura; Teruko Imai; Nobuo Sugiura; Hiroaki Tateno; Sachiko Akashi-Takamura
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 8.  Mouse models for the study of mucosal vaccination against otitis media.

Authors:  Albert Sabirov; Dennis W Metzger
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Preclinical evaluation of a replication-deficient intranasal DeltaNS1 H5N1 influenza vaccine.

Authors:  Julia Romanova; Brigitte M Krenn; Markus Wolschek; Boris Ferko; Ekaterina Romanovskaja-Romanko; Alexander Morokutti; Anna-Polina Shurygina; Sabine Nakowitsch; Tanja Ruthsatz; Bettina Kiefmann; Ulrich König; Michael Bergmann; Monika Sachet; Shobana Balasingam; Alexander Mann; John Oxford; Martin Slais; Oleg Kiselev; Thomas Muster; Andrej Egorov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Development of mucosal adjuvants for intranasal vaccine for H5N1 influenza viruses.

Authors:  Hideki Hasegawa; Takeshi Ichinohe; Akira Ainai; Shin-Ichi Tamura; Takeshi Kurata
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.