Literature DB >> 16346280

Effects of 2-bromoethanesulfonic Acid and 2- chloroethanesulfonic Acid on acetate utilization in a continuous-flow methanogenic fixed-film column.

E J Bouwer1, P L McCarty.   

Abstract

2-Bromoethanesulfonic acid (BESA) and 2-chloroethanesulfonic acid (CESA) have been reported to be potent inhibitors of methane formation during methanogenic decomposition in batch cultures. However, in a laboratory-scale continuous-flow methanogenic fixed-film column containing a predominance of acetate-decarboxylating methanogens, BESA at 6 x 10 M produced only a 41% inhibition of acetate utilization, and CESA at 5.4 x 10 M produced a 37% inhibition of acetate utilization. BESA and CESA concentrations were not monitored in the effluent, so their fate is unknown. The organisms in the column were capable of degrading trace halogenated aliphatic compounds ( approximately 30 mug/liter) with acetate (100 mg/liter) as the primary substrate. Previous exposure of the cells to halogenated organic compounds may have conferred resistance to BESA and CESA. Degradation of the inhibitor compounds is another possible explanation for the observed effects.

Entities:  

Year:  1983        PMID: 16346280      PMCID: PMC242472          DOI: 10.1128/aem.45.4.1408-1410.1983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  5 in total

1.  Methanogenic decomposition of ferulic Acid, a model lignin derivative.

Authors:  J B Healy; L Y Young; M Reinhard
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Microbial formation of ethane in anoxic estuarine sediments.

Authors:  R S Oremland
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Transformations of 1- and 2-carbon halogenated aliphatic organic compounds under methanogenic conditions.

Authors:  E J Bouwer; P L McCarty
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Methane formation and methane oxidation by methanogenic bacteria.

Authors:  A J Zehnder; T D Brock
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Characterization of an acetate-decarboxylating, non-hydrogen-oxidizing methane bacterium.

Authors:  A J Zehnder; B A Huser; T D Brock; K Wuhrmann
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.552

  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  Selective inhibition by 2-bromoethanesulfonate of methanogenesis from acetate in a thermophilic anaerobic digestor.

Authors:  S H Zinder; T Anguish; S C Cardwell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Production of ethane, ethylene, and acetylene from halogenated hydrocarbons by methanogenic bacteria.

Authors:  N Belay; L Daniels
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Effects of hydrogen and formate on the degradation of propionate and butyrate in thermophilic granules from an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor.

Authors:  J E Schmidt; B K Ahring
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Enrichment and isolation of Acetitomaculum ruminis, gen. nov., sp. nov.: acetogenic bacteria from the bovine rumen.

Authors:  R C Greening; J A Leedle
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.552

Review 5.  Novel strategies towards efficient molecular biohydrogen production by dark fermentative mechanism: present progress and future perspective.

Authors:  Varsha Jayachandran; Nitai Basak; Roberto De Philippis; Alessandra Adessi
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.434

6.  Competition between Methanogens and Acetogens in Biocathodes: A Comparison between Potentiostatic and Galvanostatic Control.

Authors:  Sam D Molenaar; Pradip Saha; Annemerel R Mol; Tom H J A Sleutels; Annemiek Ter Heijne; Cees J N Buisman
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.