Literature DB >> 16344993

Maturity-associated variation in the body size and proportions of elite female gymnasts 14-17 years of age.

Albrecht L Claessens1, Johan Lefevre, Gaston P Beunen, Robert M Malina.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate variations in the size and body proportions of elite female gymnasts associated with individual differences in maturity status. The subjects were 150 gymnasts, 14.0-17.9 years of age, who had participated in the 24th World Championship in Artistic Gymnastics, Rotterdam. Height, body mass, sitting height and biacromial and bicristal breadths were measured. Leg length was estimated as the height minus sitting height, and the ratio of sitting height to height was calculated. Information on menarcheal status was obtained by means of a questionnaire, and hand-wrist radiographs were taken to assess skeletal maturity status. For the purpose of data analysis the gymnasts were divided into three maturity groups within each single-year chronological age (CA) group from 14 to 17 years: pre-menarcheal (n=65); post-menarcheal but not skeletally mature (SA<16.0 years, n=37); post-menarcheal, skeletally mature (n=48). Differences among the groups were tested with analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey tests. The results showed that pre-menarcheal gymnasts are smaller in all dimensions compared to post-menarcheal gymnasts in all age groups but that the significance of differences varies. Post-menarcheal, skeletally mature gymnasts are heavier than pre-menarcheal gymnasts, but weight does not differ between gymnasts in the two post-menarcheal groups (with one exception, 16 years). Post-menarcheal, skeletally mature gymnasts have proportionally shorter legs than gymnasts in the other two maturity categories. Elite gymnasts of contrasting maturity status show similar trends in body size and proportions similar to those of non-athlete adolescent girls of contrasting maturity status. The results highlight the need to consider maturity-associated variation in the body dimensions of gymnasts before attributing their characteristics to the demands of regular training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16344993     DOI: 10.1007/s00431-005-0017-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  10 in total

1.  Short stature and delayed puberty in gymnasts: influence of selection bias on leg length and the duration of training on trunk length.

Authors:  S Bass; M Bradney; G Pearce; E Hendrich; K Inge; S Stuckey; S K Lo; E Seeman
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 2.  [Evolution of the physiological profile of gymnasts over the past 40 years. A review of the literature].

Authors:  M Jemni; F Friemel; W Sands; A Mikesky
Journal:  Can J Appl Physiol       Date:  2001-10

3.  Anthropometric characteristics of outstanding male and female gymnasts.

Authors:  A L Claessens; F M Veer; V Stijnen; J Lefevre; H Maes; G Steens; G Beunen
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.337

4.  [Growth and puberty in 7-to-16-year-old female gymnasts: a prospective study].

Authors:  O Tönz; S M Stronski; C Y Gmeiner
Journal:  Schweiz Med Wochenschr       Date:  1990-01-10

Review 5.  Physical growth and biological maturation of young athletes.

Authors:  R M Malina
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 6.230

6.  Evidence for a reduction of growth potential in adolescent female gymnasts.

Authors:  G E Theintz; H Howald; U Weiss; P C Sizonenko
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  Growth and maturity characteristics of schoolboy gymnasts.

Authors:  J M Buckler; D A Brodie
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 1.533

8.  Influence of intensive exercise on insulin-like growth factor I, thyroid and steroid hormones in female gymnasts.

Authors:  G Jahreis; E Kauf; G Fröhner; H E Schmidt
Journal:  Growth Regul       Date:  1991-09

9.  Growth in body size affects rotational performance in women's gymnastics.

Authors:  Timothy Ackland; Bruce Elliott; Joanne Richards
Journal:  Sports Biomech       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.832

10.  Growth and menarcheal status of elite female gymnasts.

Authors:  A L Claessens; R M Malina; J Lefevre; G Beunen; V Stijnen; H Maes; F M Veer
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.411

  10 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Skeletal age and age verification in youth sport.

Authors:  Robert M Malina
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  An update of the statistical methods underlying the FELS method of skeletal maturity assessment.

Authors:  Ramzi W Nahhas; Richard J Sherwood; Wm Cameron Chumlea; Dana L Duren
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 1.533

Review 3.  Role of intensive training in the growth and maturation of artistic gymnasts.

Authors:  Robert M Malina; Adam D G Baxter-Jones; Neil Armstrong; Gaston P Beunen; Dennis Caine; Robin M Daly; Richard D Lewis; Alan D Rogol; Keith Russell
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  The Physique of Elite Female Artistic Gymnasts: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sarita Bacciotti; Adam Baxter-Jones; Adroaldo Gaya; José Maia
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.193

5.  The faster, the better? Relationships between run-up speed, the degree of difficulty (D-score), height and length of flight on vault in artistic gymnastics.

Authors:  Christoph Schärer; Thomas Lehmann; Falk Naundorf; Wolfgang Taube; Klaus Hübner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.