Literature DB >> 16344987

Ethanol-induced conditioned place preference, but not aversion, is blocked by treatment with D -penicillamine, an inactivation agent for acetaldehyde.

Laura Font1, Carlos M G Aragon, Marta Miquel.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: There is evidence to suggest that acetaldehyde is involved in the control of ethanol-seeking behavior and reward. D -penicillamine, a thiol amino acid, is a highly selective agent for the inactivation of acetaldehyde. Previous studies from our laboratory have demonstrated that D -penicillamine prevents both behavioral stimulation induced by ethanol and acetaldehyde-produced locomotor depression in mice.
OBJECTIVES: The contribution of ethanol-derived acetaldehyde to the affective effects of ethanol (preference and aversion) was assessed using an unbiased place conditioning design.
METHODS: Male mice received four pairings of a distinctive floor stimulus (CS+: GRID+ or HOLE+) with injections of saline and ethanol (2 g/kg) given before (preference) or after (aversion) the 5-min exposure to the place conditioning apparatus. A different floor stimulus (CS-: GRID- or HOLE-), associated with saline-saline injections on alternate days, was presented. For a different group of animals, the pairings with the CS+ were associated with saline and ethanol injections, but on alternate days, they received D -penicillamine (50 or 75 mg/kg) and ethanol injections paired with the CS-floor stimulus. A 60-min preference test was carried out 24 h after the last conditioning trial. A similar procedure was followed to test the effect of D -penicillamine on morphine (16 mg/kg) and cocaine-induced (20 mg/kg) conditioned place preference (CPP).
RESULTS: CPP and conditioned place aversion (CPA) were observed for ethanol, but D -penicillamine only blocked CPP. D -penicillamine, by itself, did not produce either rewarding or aversive effects. CPP observed for morphine and cocaine was unaffected by D -penicillamine pretreatment.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest that the selective inactivation of acetaldehyde blocked the rewarding, but not aversive, effects of ethanol and support the role of this ethanol metabolite in the affective properties of ethanol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16344987     DOI: 10.1007/s00213-005-0224-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  59 in total

1.  Regional heterogeneity for the intracranial self-administration of ethanol within the ventral tegmental area of female Wistar rats.

Authors:  Z A Rodd-Henricks; D L McKinzie; R S Crile; J M Murphy; W J McBride
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Measuring reward with the conditioned place preference paradigm: a comprehensive review of drug effects, recent progress and new issues.

Authors:  T M Tzschentke
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 11.685

3.  Dose- and conditioning trial-dependent ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in Swiss-Webster mice.

Authors:  F O Risinger; R A Oakes
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.533

4.  Studies on ethanol-brain catalase interaction: evidence for central ethanol oxidation.

Authors:  C M Aragon; L M Stotland; Z Amit
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  Conditioned aversion after delay place conditioning with nicotine.

Authors:  P J Fudala; E T Iwamoto
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Ethanol-induced conditioned place aversion in mice.

Authors:  C L Cunningham; C M Henderson
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.293

7.  Behavioral consequences of the hypotaurine-ethanol interaction.

Authors:  L Font; M Miquel; C M Aragon
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2001 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 3.533

8.  The role of neuronal nitric oxide synthase in cocaine-induced conditioned place preference.

Authors:  Y Itzhak; J L Martin; M D Black; P L Huang
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1998-08-03       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  Involvement of brain ethanol metabolism on acute tolerance development and on ethanol consumption in alcohol-drinker (UChB) and non-drinker (UChA) rats.

Authors:  Lutske Tampier; Maria Elena Quintanilla
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.280

10.  7-Nitroindazole blocks conditioned place preference but not hyperactivity induced by morphine.

Authors:  Carmen Manzanedo; María A Aguilar; Marta Rodríguez-Arias; Miguel Navarro; José Miñarro
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  26 in total

1.  The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha agonist fenofibrate attenuates alcohol self-administration in rats.

Authors:  Colin N Haile; Therese A Kosten
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 5.250

2.  Involvement of the beta-endorphin neurons of the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus in ethanol-induced place preference conditioning in mice.

Authors:  Raúl Pastor; Laura Font; Marta Miquel; Tamara J Phillips; Carlos M G Aragon
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Role of ethanol-derived acetaldehyde in operant oral self-administration of ethanol in rats.

Authors:  Alessandra T Peana; Valeria Porcheddu; Federico Bennardini; Antonio Carta; Michela Rosas; Elio Acquas
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Nicotine enhances the locomotor stimulating but not the conditioned rewarding effect of ethanol in DBA/2J mice.

Authors:  Noah R Gubner; Christopher L Cunningham; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  α-Lipoic acid, a scavenging agent for H₂O₂, reduces ethanol-stimulated locomotion in mice.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Ledesma; Carlos M G Aragon
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Modulation of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in mice by 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole and D-penicillamine depends on ethanol dose and number of conditioning trials.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Ledesma; Laura Font; Pablo Baliño; Carlos M G Aragon
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-07-07       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Microinjections of acetaldehyde or salsolinol into the posterior ventral tegmental area increase dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens shell.

Authors:  Gerald A Deehan; Eric A Engleman; Zheng-Ming Ding; William J McBride; Zachary A Rodd
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Central reinforcing effects of ethanol are blocked by catalase inhibition.

Authors:  Michael E Nizhnikov; Juan C Molina; Norman E Spear
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.405

9.  Reduction in the anxiolytic effects of ethanol by centrally formed acetaldehyde: the role of catalase inhibitors and acetaldehyde-sequestering agents.

Authors:  M Correa; H M Manrique; L Font; M A Escrig; C M G Aragon
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Acquisition and reconditioning of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in mice is blocked by the H₂O₂ scavenger alpha lipoic acid.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Ledesma; Carlos M G Aragon
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.