Literature DB >> 16344977

CT directed diagnostic and therapeutic pericardiocentesis: 8-year experience at a single institution.

S V Klein1, H Afridi, D Agarwal, B F Coughlin, L H Schielke.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: A retrospective review of the 8-year experience at a single institution performing more than 300 CT directed pericardiocenteses was performed. The technique, results, and complications were determined. Comparative data from the literature relating to cardiology and thoracic surgery are reviewed. A CPT code data base search was performed to identify all imaging directed pericardiocenteses at a 550 bed regional medical center between 1993 and 2001. Medical records, imaging studies, and reports as well as pertinent laboratory, chemistry and hematology values were reviewed. Demographics, results, fluid analyses, techniques, systems used and complications were recorded.
RESULTS: Three hundred and nineteen pericardiocenteses using CT localization were attempted on 261 patients. One hundred and forty-two men were included and mean age was 61 years (range 6 months to 89 years). Mean volume aspirated was 418 cc (range 0-1,875 cc). The major complication rate was 0.3%; the minor complication rate was 6.9%. Technical success was achieved in 98.4% procedures. Emergent pericardiocentesis was performed on anticoagulated patients without significant bleeding. Seventy-nine percent of patients with echocardiographic evidence of tamponade had symptomatic improvement. Patients with marked shortness of breath without other evidence of tamponade benefited symptomatically in 78%. Pericardiocenteses with CT localization is relatively safe and many patients achieve symptomatic relief.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16344977     DOI: 10.1007/s10140-004-0389-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Radiol        ISSN: 1070-3004


  28 in total

1.  [Late pericardial effusion after open-heart surgery: usefulness of pericardiocentesis under echocardiographic guidance].

Authors:  S Suehiro; E Kimura; T Shibata; H Minamimura; Y Sasaki; K Hattori; H Kumano; H Kinoshita
Journal:  Kyobu Geka       Date:  1996-02

2.  CT-guided pericardial drainage catheter placement with subsequent pericardial sclerosis.

Authors:  R J Bellon; W H Wright; E C Unger
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Subxiphoid pericardial drainage for pericardial tamponade.

Authors:  D W Moores; K B Allen; L P Faber; S W Dziuban; D J Gillman; W H Warren; R Ilves; L Lininger
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Should pericardial drainage be performed routinely in patients who have a large pericardial effusion without tamponade?

Authors:  J Mercé; J Sagristà-Sauleda; G Permanyer-Miralda; J Soler-Soler
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  How do the clinical findings in patients with pericardial effusions influence the success of aspiration?

Authors:  J P Cooper; R M Oliver; P Currie; J M Walker; R H Swanton
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-04

6.  Clinical experience with subxyphoid pericardial decompression.

Authors:  S C Ghosh; A J Larrieu; S G Ablaza; V P Grana
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  1985 Jan-Mar

7.  Pericardial effusion and pericardial compartments after open heart surgery. An analysis by computed tomography and echocardiography.

Authors:  O Duvernoy; S G Larsson; K Persson; J Thurén; G Wikström
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 1.990

8.  Non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema after pericardial drainage for cardiac tamponade.

Authors:  F Glasser; A M Fein; S H Feinsilver; E Cotton; M S Niederman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Subxiphoid partial pericardiectomy with or without sclerosant instillation in the treatment of symptomatic pericardial effusions in patients with malignancy.

Authors:  A Chan; D Rischin; C P Clarke; R K Woodruff
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  [Ultrasound-guided pericardial drainage. Experience in 34 consecutive patients].

Authors:  F Vayre; H Lardoux; F Koukoui; J P Ollivier; M Pezzano
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  1997-06-28       Impact factor: 1.228

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Computed tomography-guided pericardiocentesis: a systematic review concerning contemporary evidence and future perspectives.

Authors:  Eduardo M Vilela; Catarina Ruivo; Claudio E Guerreiro; Marisa P Silva; Ricardo Ladeiras-Lopes; Daniel Caeiro; Gustavo P Morais; João Primo; Pedro Braga; Nuno Ferreira; José Pedro L Nunes; Vasco Gama Ribeiro
Journal:  Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2018-08-15

Review 2.  Pericardial Drain Placement in Interventional Radiology: An Overview.

Authors:  Josi L Herren; HingKui Chan; Charles E Ray
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 1.780

Review 3.  CT-Guided Pericardial Drainage: A Safe and Viable Alternative to Ultrasound-Guided Drainage.

Authors:  Ross B Ingber; Mustafa Al-Roubaie; Umairullah Lodhi; Craig Greben
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 1.780

4.  A "Vanishing", Tuberculous, Pericardial Effusion.

Authors:  Jacques Liebenberg; Pieter van der Bijl
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.243

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.