Literature DB >> 16344364

Cost-effectiveness of ambulatory blood pressure: a reanalysis.

Lawrence R Krakoff1.   

Abstract

Accurate diagnosis of hypertension and prognosis for future cardiovascular events can be enhanced through the use of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. It has been suggested that the use of ambulatory monitoring as a secondary screening for hypertension might be cost-effective. Many needed studies that are related to the calculation of cost-effectiveness for ambulatory monitoring have become available in recent years. More accurate estimates for cost of care, costs for testing, prevalence of white-coat hypertension, and incidence of the transition from normal pressures to hypertension have been reported. This study presents calculations of the cost savings likely to take place when ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is implemented for newly detected hypertensive subjects. These calculations are based on current estimates for cost of testing, cost of treatment, prevalence of white-coat hypertension at baseline, and varying the incidence of new hypertension after the initial screening. The results indicate a potential savings of 3% to 14% for cost of care for hypertension and 10% to 23% reduction in treatment days when ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is incorporated into the diagnostic process. At current reimbursement rates, the cost of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring for secondary screening on an annual basis would be <10% of treatment costs. Calculated savings for use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring can take place when annual treatment costs are as little as 300 dollars. These estimates should be considered for the management of recently detected hypertension, especially when the risk of future cardiovascular is disease is low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16344364     DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000197195.84725.66

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  24 in total

1.  Hypertension: Ambulatory blood-pressure monitoring has arrived.

Authors:  Lawrence R Krakoff
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  Clinical significance of home blood pressure and its possible practical application.

Authors:  Yutaka Imai
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 2.801

Review 3.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: from old concepts to novel insights.

Authors:  Mehmet Kanbay; Kultigin Turkmen; Tevfik Ecder; Adrian Covic
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in hypertension: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2012-05-01

Review 5.  Ambulatory blood pressure improves prediction of cardiovascular risk: implications for better antihypertensive management.

Authors:  Lawrence R Krakoff
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 6.  Utility of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children and adolescents.

Authors:  John W Graves; Mohammed Mahdi Althaf
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 3.714

7.  Rates, amounts, and determinants of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring claim reimbursements among Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Shia T Kent; Daichi Shimbo; Lei Huang; Keith M Diaz; Anthony J Viera; Meredith Kilgore; Suzanne Oparil; Paul Muntner
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2014-10-02

Review 8.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a versatile tool for evaluating and managing hypertension in children.

Authors:  Alisa A Acosta; Karen L McNiece
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 3.714

9.  Call to action on use and reimbursement for home blood pressure monitoring: a joint scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American Society Of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering; Nancy Houston Miller; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Lawrence R Krakoff; Nancy T Artinian; David Goff
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 10.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in clinical practice: a review.

Authors:  J Rick Turner; Anthony J Viera; Daichi Shimbo
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 4.965

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.