PURPOSE: Although gemcitabine remains the standard of care for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, additional improvements may be realized by combining therapeutic agents with synergistic activity, and optimizing drug delivery using pharmacokinetic principles such as fixed dose rate (FDR) infusion. The objectives of this study were to determine safety and efficacy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with FDR gemcitabine in combination with low-dose cisplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were treated with a combination of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 at 10 mg/m2/min together with cisplatin 20 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Patient follow-up was performed using computerized tomographic scans and serial CA 19-9 measurements. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients were enrolled onto the study, with a median follow-up time of 215 days. Twenty-two of 40 patients (55.0%) with a baseline serum CA 19-9 level > or = 2x the upper limit of normal demonstrated a > or = 50% biomarker decline during treatment. Nine of 47 patients (19.1%) with measurable disease achieved a partial response, and 28 patients (59.6%) had disease stabilization for at least two treatment cycles. Median time to progression was 3.9 months and median survival was 7.1 months, with an estimated 1-year survival rate of 29%. The most frequently reported grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (52.9%) and thrombocytopenia (15.7%). Most patients were switched to an every-other-week dosing schedule. CONCLUSION: The combination of FDR gemcitabine and cisplatin is well tolerated and appears to be an acceptable, albeit not clearly superior, alternative to other gemcitabine/platinum regimens for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer.
PURPOSE: Although gemcitabine remains the standard of care for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, additional improvements may be realized by combining therapeutic agents with synergistic activity, and optimizing drug delivery using pharmacokinetic principles such as fixed dose rate (FDR) infusion. The objectives of this study were to determine safety and efficacy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with FDR gemcitabine in combination with low-dose cisplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were treated with a combination of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 at 10 mg/m2/min together with cisplatin 20 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Patient follow-up was performed using computerized tomographic scans and serial CA 19-9 measurements. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients were enrolled onto the study, with a median follow-up time of 215 days. Twenty-two of 40 patients (55.0%) with a baseline serum CA 19-9 level > or = 2x the upper limit of normal demonstrated a > or = 50% biomarker decline during treatment. Nine of 47 patients (19.1%) with measurable disease achieved a partial response, and 28 patients (59.6%) had disease stabilization for at least two treatment cycles. Median time to progression was 3.9 months and median survival was 7.1 months, with an estimated 1-year survival rate of 29%. The most frequently reported grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (52.9%) and thrombocytopenia (15.7%). Most patients were switched to an every-other-week dosing schedule. CONCLUSION: The combination of FDR gemcitabine and cisplatin is well tolerated and appears to be an acceptable, albeit not clearly superior, alternative to other gemcitabine/platinum regimens for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Authors: Shubham Pant; Ludmila K Martin; Susan Geyer; Lai Wei; Katherine Van Loon; Nili Sommovilla; Nilli Sommovilla; Mark Zalupski; Renuka Iyer; David Fogelman; Andrew H Ko; Tanios Bekaii-Saab Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-03-13 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Laura Raftery; Joel E Tepper; Richard M Goldberg; A William Blackstock; Mebea Aklilu; Stephen A Bernard; Anastasia Ivanova; Janine M Davies; Bert H O'Neil Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Andrew H Ko; Elizabeth Dito; Brian Schillinger; Alan P Venook; Zhidong Xu; Emily K Bergsland; Derrick Wong; Janet Scott; Jimmy Hwang; Margaret A Tempero Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Dan Laheru; Eric Lutz; James Burke; Barbara Biedrzycki; Sara Solt; Beth Onners; Irena Tartakovsky; John Nemunaitis; Dung Le; Elizabeth Sugar; Kristen Hege; Elizabeth Jaffee Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-03-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Stefano Crippa; Ismael Domínguez; J Ruben Rodríguez; Oswaldo Razo; Sarah P Thayer; David P Ryan; Andrew L Warshaw; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2008-03-04 Impact factor: 3.452