BACKGROUND: Perfusion and functional data obtained during gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) have proven prognostic value in the middle-aged patient population. The aim of this study was to investigate whether perfusion and functional cardiac gated SPECT data have prognostic value in patients aged 75 years or older. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied clinical and gated SPECT predictors of cardiac and all-cause death in 294 patients aged 75 years or older with known or suspected coronary artery disease who were referred for tetrofosmin cardiac gated SPECT imaging. Summed perfusion scores were calculated in a 17-segment model by use of commercially available software (4D-MSPECT). Left ventricular functional data were calculated by use of QGS gated SPECT software. The median age of the study population was 78 years (range, 75-91 years). There were 160 men (54%) and 134 women (46%). During a median follow-up of 25.9 months (range, 1.8-36 months), 47 patients (16%) died (27 cardiac deaths). In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, the summed rest score (chi2 gain = 8.0, P = .009), transient ischemic dilatation index (chi2 gain = 6.3, P = .012), and resting left ventricular ejection fraction (chi2 gain = 7.0, P = .030) were independent predictors of all-cause death. The summed rest score (chi2 gain = 8.2, P = .004) and resting end-systolic volume (chi2 gain = 13.7, P = .005) were independent predictors of cardiac death. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that gated SPECT left ventricular functional data assessed during myocardial gated SPECT provide independent and incremental information above clinical and perfusion SPECT data for the prediction of cardiac and all-cause death in patients aged 75 years or older referred for myocardial SPECT imaging.
BACKGROUND: Perfusion and functional data obtained during gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) have proven prognostic value in the middle-aged patient population. The aim of this study was to investigate whether perfusion and functional cardiac gated SPECT data have prognostic value in patients aged 75 years or older. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied clinical and gated SPECT predictors of cardiac and all-cause death in 294 patients aged 75 years or older with known or suspected coronary artery disease who were referred for tetrofosmin cardiac gated SPECT imaging. Summed perfusion scores were calculated in a 17-segment model by use of commercially available software (4D-MSPECT). Left ventricular functional data were calculated by use of QGS gated SPECT software. The median age of the study population was 78 years (range, 75-91 years). There were 160 men (54%) and 134 women (46%). During a median follow-up of 25.9 months (range, 1.8-36 months), 47 patients (16%) died (27 cardiac deaths). In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, the summed rest score (chi2 gain = 8.0, P = .009), transient ischemic dilatation index (chi2 gain = 6.3, P = .012), and resting left ventricular ejection fraction (chi2 gain = 7.0, P = .030) were independent predictors of all-cause death. The summed rest score (chi2 gain = 8.2, P = .004) and resting end-systolic volume (chi2 gain = 13.7, P = .005) were independent predictors of cardiac death. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that gated SPECT left ventricular functional data assessed during myocardial gated SPECT provide independent and incremental information above clinical and perfusion SPECT data for the prediction of cardiac and all-cause death in patients aged 75 years or older referred for myocardial SPECT imaging.
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Olivier De Winter; Pieter De Bondt; Christophe Van De Wiele; Guy De Backer; Rudi A Dierckx; Johan De Sutter Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2004 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: B Kühn Madsen; H Egeblad; S Højberg; T Melchior; R Videbaek; C Sørum; L Spange Mortensen; J Fischer Hansen Journal: Cardiology Date: 1995 Impact factor: 1.869
Authors: J Candell-Riera; J Llevadot; C Santana; J Castell; S Aguadé; L Armadans; B Bermejo; G Oller; H García-del-Castillo; M Soler-Peter; J Soler-Soler Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2001 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: D S Berman; X Kang; K F Van Train; H C Lewin; I Cohen; J Areeda; J D Friedman; G Germano; L J Shaw; R Hachamovitch Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: R Parker Ward; Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Gabriel B Grossman; Christopher L Hansen; Robert C Hendel; Todd C Kerwin; Benjamin D McCallister; Rupa Mehta; Donna M Polk; Peter L Tilkemeier; Aseem Vashist; Kim Allan Williams; David G Wolinsky; Edward P Ficaro Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2007 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Deborah H Kwon; Venu Menon; Penny Houghtaling; Elizabeth Lieber; Richard C Brunken; Manuel D Cerqueira; Wael A Jaber Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Date: 2014-02
Authors: Stefan Roest; Hendrik J Boiten; Ron T van Domburg; Roelf Valkema; Arend F L Schinkel Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2016-07-05 Impact factor: 5.952