Literature DB >> 16344203

Clinical judgments about endotracheal suctioning: what cues do expert pediatric critical care nurses consider?

Margot Thomas1, Frances Fothergill-Bourbonnais.   

Abstract

Making accurate and timely judgments based on multiple ways of knowing is an essential skill in critical care nursing practice. Studies have proposed that positive patient outcomes are linked to expert judgments in a variety of critical care situations; however, little is known about clinical judgments related to specific critical care nursing interventions. This article presents a qualitative nursing research study which examined the cues that expert pediatric critical care nurses used in making clinical judgments about suctioning intubated and ventilated, critically ill children. The participants' words and actions attest that the 'sensing' and 'thinking' of the process of cue use, are interwoven with, and integral to, the 'doing,' which is the process of skilled performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16344203     DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2005.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am        ISSN: 0899-5885            Impact factor:   1.326


  2 in total

Review 1.  Frequency of endotracheal suctioning for the prevention of respiratory morbidity in ventilated newborns.

Authors:  Matteo Bruschettini; Simona Zappettini; Lorenzo Moja; Maria Grazia Calevo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-03-07

2.  The practice of intensive care nurses using the closed suctioning system: An observational study.

Authors:  Somayeh Haghighat; AhmadReza Yazdannik
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.