OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability and validity of a newly described classification of sagittal plane alignment in spastic diplegic gait. DESIGN: Twenty split-screen videos of children with spastic diplegia, Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I to III, were viewed on 2 occasions, 6 weeks apart, by 5 raters. The sagittal plane alignments of the right and left lower limbs in gait were classified separately as true equinus, jump knee, apparent equinus, or crouch, based on the published classification. A fifth category, nonclassifiable, was used if classification was not possible. We then used sagittal plane kinematic data to confirm the classification for each subject and these were compared with rater classification scores, which used the video information only. SETTING: Tertiary-level children's hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Three pediatric orthopedic surgeons and 2 pediatric orthopedic residents. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gait classification scores derived from visual observation were compared among and within raters. The gait classification scores derived from visual observation were compared with the scores derived from sagittal plane kinematic data to assess validity. RESULTS: A moderate correlation was found among the 5 raters within each session, with an interrater weighted kappa score of .45 in session 1 and .49 in session 2. The intrarater, weighted kappa scores showed a moderate to substantial level of agreement between sessions, ranging from .50 to .68. The classification scores of individual raters had moderate validity when compared with classifications derived from the sagittal plane kinematic data. However, there was a substantial level of agreement between the consensus opinion and the classification obtained using the kinematic data as well as the video recordings (weighted kappa=0.8). CONCLUSIONS: This classification has only moderate reliability and validity when a single experienced rater views the 2-dimensional gait videos. However, the consensus opinion derived from the scores of 5 raters considerably improves the validity of the assessment.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability and validity of a newly described classification of sagittal plane alignment in spastic diplegic gait. DESIGN: Twenty split-screen videos of children with spastic diplegia, Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I to III, were viewed on 2 occasions, 6 weeks apart, by 5 raters. The sagittal plane alignments of the right and left lower limbs in gait were classified separately as true equinus, jump knee, apparent equinus, or crouch, based on the published classification. A fifth category, nonclassifiable, was used if classification was not possible. We then used sagittal plane kinematic data to confirm the classification for each subject and these were compared with rater classification scores, which used the video information only. SETTING: Tertiary-level children's hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Three pediatric orthopedic surgeons and 2 pediatric orthopedic residents. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gait classification scores derived from visual observation were compared among and within raters. The gait classification scores derived from visual observation were compared with the scores derived from sagittal plane kinematic data to assess validity. RESULTS: A moderate correlation was found among the 5 raters within each session, with an interrater weighted kappa score of .45 in session 1 and .49 in session 2. The intrarater, weighted kappa scores showed a moderate to substantial level of agreement between sessions, ranging from .50 to .68. The classification scores of individual raters had moderate validity when compared with classifications derived from the sagittal plane kinematic data. However, there was a substantial level of agreement between the consensus opinion and the classification obtained using the kinematic data as well as the video recordings (weighted kappa=0.8). CONCLUSIONS: This classification has only moderate reliability and validity when a single experienced rater views the 2-dimensional gait videos. However, the consensus opinion derived from the scores of 5 raters considerably improves the validity of the assessment.
Authors: Roslyn N Boyd; Peter Sw Davies; Jenny Ziviani; Stewart Trost; Lee Barber; Robert Ware; Stephen Rose; Koa Whittingham; Leanne Sakzewski; Kristie Bell; Christopher Carty; Steven Obst; Katherine Benfer; Sarah Reedman; Priya Edwards; Megan Kentish; Lisa Copeland; Kelly Weir; Camilla Davenport; Denise Brooks; Alan Coulthard; Rebecca Pelekanos; Andrea Guzzetta; Simona Fiori; Meredith Wynter; Christine Finn; Andrea Burgess; Kym Morris; John Walsh; Owen Lloyd; Jennifer A Whitty; Paul A Scuffham Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Roslyn N Boyd; Rachel Jordan; Laura Pareezer; Anne Moodie; Christine Finn; Belinda Luther; Evyn Arnfield; Aaron Pym; Alex Craven; Paula Beall; Kelly Weir; Megan Kentish; Meredith Wynter; Robert Ware; Michael Fahey; Barry Rawicki; Lynne McKinlay; Andrea Guzzetta Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2013-06-11 Impact factor: 2.474