Literature DB >> 16344024

Efficacy and safety of oxymorphone immediate release for the treatment of mild to moderate pain after ambulatory orthopedic surgery: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Joseph S Gimbel1, Dean Walker, Tina Ma, Harry Ahdieh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the analgesic efficacy and safety of 5 mg of oxymorphone immediate release (IR) for mild to moderate pain.
DESIGN: Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.
SETTING: Ambulatory surgical centers. PARTICIPANTS: Outpatients (age, > or = 18 y) undergoing knee arthroscopy. INTERVENTION: Randomization to 5 mg of oxymorphone IR or placebo hourly as needed for up to 8 hours. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Sum of pain intensity difference (SPID) from baseline to 8 hours.
RESULTS: Among 122 patients randomized, 70.5% and 28.7% had moderate or mild postsurgical pain at baseline, respectively. The mean SPID score was significantly greater in the oxymorphone IR group, showing greater pain relief, compared with the placebo group (least squares mean difference +/- standard error, 76.9+/-28.09; 95% confidence interval, 21.26-132.59; P=.007). More placebo patients (48.4%) required rescue medication than oxymorphone IR patients (16.7%), with median times to use of rescue medication of 6 hours 54 minutes and more than 8 hours, respectively (P<.001). More patients (47.4%) rated oxymorphone IR "very good" or "excellent" for pain relief versus placebo (25.0%). No oxymorphone IR-treated patients discontinued because of adverse events (AEs) or experienced serious AEs.
CONCLUSIONS: Five milligrams of oxymorphone IR was well tolerated and effective at relieving mild or moderate postsurgical pain after outpatient knee surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16344024     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.07.303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  5 in total

1.  Pharmacodynamic effects of oral oxymorphone: abuse liability, analgesic profile and direct physiologic effects in humans.

Authors:  Shanna Babalonis; Michelle R Lofwall; Paul A Nuzzo; Sharon L Walsh
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.280

2.  Relative potency of intravenous oxymorphone compared to other µ opioid agonists in humans - pilot study outcomes.

Authors:  Shanna Babalonis; Sandra D Comer; Jermaine D Jones; Paul Nuzzo; Michelle R Lofwall; Jeanne Manubay; Kevin W Hatton; Robert A Whittington; Sharon L Walsh
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.415

3.  Review of oral oxymorphone in the management of pain.

Authors:  Paul Sloan
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.423

4.  The safety and effectiveness of a long-acting transdermal fentanyl solution compared with oxymorphone for the control of postoperative pain in dogs: a randomized, multicentered clinical study.

Authors:  S A Martinez; M G Wilson; D D Linton; G C Newbound; K J Freise; T-L Lin; T P Clark
Journal:  J Vet Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 1.786

5.  Opioid Use Is Reduced in Patients Treated with NSAIDs After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Kamali A Thompson; David Klein; Michael J Alaia; Eric J Strauss; Laith M Jazrawi; Kirk A Campbell
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-12-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.