Literature DB >> 16343856

Pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin XR (1000 mg) versus levofloxacin (500 mg) in plasma and urine of male and female healthy volunteers receiving a single oral dose.

Florian M E Wagenlehner1, Martina Kinzig-Schippers, Uwe Tischmeyer, Christine Wagenlehner, Fritz Sörgel, Axel Dalhoff, Kurt G Naber.   

Abstract

The new extended-release formulation of ciprofloxacin (ciprofloxacin XR) was designed for once-daily administration in the treatment of urinary tract infection (UTI). The aim of this study was to compare concentrations in plasma, urinary excretion (UE) and pharmacokinetic parameters of ciprofloxacin XR (1000 mg) versus those of levofloxacin (500 mg) in healthy volunteers receiving a single oral dose. In this randomised crossover study, 12 volunteers (6 males, 6 females) received a single oral dose of 1000 mg ciprofloxacin XR or 500 mg levofloxacin to assess the concentrations (by high-pressure liquid chromatography) in plasma up to 32 h and the UE at intervals up to 36 h. The following pharmacokinetic parameters were studied: C(max), t(max), t(1/2), AUC(plasma0-->infinity), AUC(plasma0-->last), Cl(ren), maximal urinary concentration (U(max)), AUC(urine0-->last) and UE. Both fluoroquinolones were well tolerated. The plasma concentrations of levofloxacin were significantly higher than those of ciprofloxacin XR throughout the study period. The urinary concentrations of ciprofloxacin XR were significantly higher than those of levofloxacin in the first collection interval (0-4 h), whereas the concentrations of levofloxacin were significantly higher than those of ciprofloxacin XR in the five last collection intervals (12-36 h). The median proportions of cumulative renal excretion of the administered dose of the parent drug up to 36 h were 43.1% for ciprofloxacin XR (range, 13.7-50.8%; mean +/- standard deviation (S.D.), 40.5 +/- 9.9%) and 79.8% for levofloxacin (range, 74.0-88.2%; mean +/- S.D., 80.4 +/- 5.5%). C(max), AUC(plasma0-->infinity), AUC(plasma0-->last) and UE were statistically significantly higher in the levofloxacin than in the ciprofloxacin XR phase; t(max), Cl(ren) and U(max) were statistically significantly higher in the ciprofloxacin XR phase than in the levofloxacin phase; and AUC(urine0-->last) and t(1/2) were not statistically different. After an oral administration of ciprofloxacin XR 1000 mg and levofloxacin 500 mg, C(max) and AUC(plasma0-->infinity) were significantly higher in the levofloxacin phase. UE of ciprofloxacin XR 1000 mg once daily, however, was equivalent to that of levofloxacin 500 mg, and overall comparable urinary concentrations and AUC(urine) were reached by both drugs. Therefore, it can be assumed that the two doses investigated can be considered equivalent for the treatment of UTI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16343856     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents        ISSN: 0924-8579            Impact factor:   5.283


  13 in total

1.  Urinary bactericidal activity of extended-release ciprofloxacin (1,000 milligrams) versus levofloxacin (500 milligrams) in healthy volunteers receiving a single oral dose.

Authors:  Florian M E Wagenlehner; Martina Kinzig-Schippers; Uwe Tischmeyer; Christine Wagenlehner; Fritz Sörgel; Kurt G Naber
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Urinary Tract Infections: Resistance Is Futile.

Authors:  Eric Wenzler; Larry H Danziger
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  The role of fluoroquinolones in the management of urinary tract infections in areas with high rates of fluoroquinolone-resistant uropathogens.

Authors:  Y-H Chen; W-C Ko; P-R Hsueh
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 4.  Pharmacokinetic characteristics of antimicrobials and optimal treatment of urosepsis.

Authors:  Florian M E Wagenlehner; Wolfgang Weidner; Kurt G Naber
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Carbapenem-Containing Combination Antibiotic Therapy against Carbapenem-Resistant Uropathogenic Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Maria Loose; Isabell Link; Kurt G Naber; Florian M E Wagenlehner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  In Vivo Bioluminescent Monitoring of Therapeutic Efficacy and Pharmacodynamic Target Assessment of Antofloxacin against Escherichia coli in a Neutropenic Murine Thigh Infection Model.

Authors:  Yu-Feng Zhou; Meng-Ting Tao; Yu-Zhang He; Jian Sun; Ya-Hong Liu; Xiao-Ping Liao
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Use of pharmacodynamic principles to optimise dosage regimens for antibacterial agents in the elderly.

Authors:  Ayman M Noreddin; Virginia Haynes
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  Urinary concentrations and antibacterial activities of nitroxoline at 250 milligrams versus trimethoprim at 200 milligrams against uropathogens in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Florian M E Wagenlehner; Fabian Münch; Adrian Pilatz; Birte Bärmann; Wolfgang Weidner; Christine M Wagenlehner; Marion Straubinger; Holger Blenk; Wolfgang Pfister; Michael Kresken; Kurt G Naber
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Urinary bactericidal activity of Doripenem versus that of levofloxacin in patients with complicated urinary tract infections or pyelonephritis.

Authors:  Florian M E Wagenlehner; Christine Wagenlehner; Rebecca Redman; Wolfgang Weidner; Kurt G Naber
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Dose escalation study of the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of nemonoxacin (TG-873870), a novel potent broad-spectrum nonfluorinated quinolone, in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Luke Lin; Li-Wen Chang; Cheng-Yuan Tsai; Ching-Hung Hsu; David T Chung; William S Aronstein; Funmi Ajayi; Barbara Kuzmak; Robert A Lyon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.