Literature DB >> 16343177

Prognostic factors in ovarian carcinoma stage III patients. Can biomarkers improve the prediction of short- and long-term survivors?

J Kaern1, M Aghmesheh, J M Nesland, H E Danielsen, B Sandstad, M Friedlander, C Tropé.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine if biomarker expression could help discriminate between short-term and long-term survivors in women with advanced ovarian cancer. Fifty-one patients with stage III ovarian cancer were selected for the study, which included 28 short-term survivors (death from ovarian cancer within 18 months) and 23 long-term survivors (alive for more than 5 years). There was no difference between the two groups with respect to FIGO substage, age, World Health Organization score, and first-line platinum therapy. Classic clinical pathologic parameters were examined together with p53, Bcl-2, Ki-67, PDGFRalpha, P-glycoprotein, BRCA1, and DNA ploidy. Immunohistochemistry was used for scoring biomarker expression and image cytometry for DNA ploidy. All patients had primary debulking surgery followed by first-line platinum therapy. On multivariate analysis, the presence of ascites, debulking surgery and repeat laparotomy, clear-cell histology, elevated CA125, and high Ki-67 score were all found to be of prognostic importance. The long-term survivors were characterized by primary optimal cytoreduction surgery (<1 cm residual disease), attempt at maximal tumor debulking by experienced gynecological oncologic surgeons, and the absence of ascites. Normal CA125 level before platinum therapy and negative Ki-67 expression also predicted a more favorable prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16343177     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2005.00185.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  19 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic significance of several biomarkers in epithelial ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis of published studies.

Authors:  Linjuan Xu; Jing Cai; Qiang Yang; Hui Ding; Liying Wu; Tao Li; Zehua Wang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Biomarker expression in normal fimbriae: Comparison of high- and low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Zhang Xuyin; Ding Jingxin; Tao Xiang; Jia Luoqi; Hua Keqin
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Diagnostic and Prognostic Significance of Ki-67 Immunohistochemical Expression in Surface Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma.

Authors:  Asha Mahadevappa; Shruthi Mysore Krishna; Manjunath Gubbanna Vimala
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-02-01

4.  Lack of prognostic relevance of Her-2/neu, topoisomerase IIα and EGFR in advanced ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Verena Engelstaedter; Judith Boda; Christine Völklein; Jutta Engel; Udo Jeschke; Thomas Kirchner; Doris Mayr
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 5.  Pathway modulations and epigenetic alterations in ovarian tumorbiogenesis.

Authors:  Sabita N Saldanha; Trygve O Tollefsbol
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.384

6.  Intraepithelial T cells and tumor proliferation: impact on the benefit from surgical cytoreduction in advanced serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Sarah F Adams; Douglas A Levine; Mark G Cadungog; Rachel Hammond; Andrea Facciabene; Narciso Olvera; Stephen C Rubin; Jeff Boyd; Phyllis A Gimotty; George Coukos
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Combined panel of serum human tissue kallikreins and CA-125 for the detection of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Stephen Chee Liang Koh; Chan Yiong Huak; Delfi Lutan; Johny Marpuang; Suwiyoga Ketut; Nyoma Gede Budiana; Agustria Zainu Saleh; Mohamad Farid Aziz; Hariyono Winarto; Heru Pradjatmo; Nguyen Khac Han Hoan; Pham Viet Thanh; Mahesh Choolani
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 4.401

8.  Modest effect of p53, EGFR and HER-2/neu on prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  P de Graeff; A P G Crijns; S de Jong; M Boezen; W J Post; E G E de Vries; A G J van der Zee; G H de Bock
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Assessment of Significant Pathway Signaling and Prognostic Value of GNG11 in Ovarian Serous Cystadenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ming-Min Jiang; Fan Zhao; Tao-Tao Lou
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-06-03

10.  A retrospective analysis of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian cancer: do we still need it?

Authors:  Nicoletta Staropoli; Domenico Ciliberto; Cirino Botta; Lucia Fiorillo; Simona Gualtieri; Angela Salvino; Pierfrancesco Tassone; Pierosandro Tagliaferri
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 4.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.