Literature DB >> 16342923

Building multivariable regression models with continuous covariates in clinical epidemiology--with an emphasis on fractional polynomials.

P Royston1, W Sauerbrei.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In fitting regression models, data analysts must often choose a model based on several candidate predictor variables which may influence the outcome. Most analysts either assume a linear relationship for continuous predictors, or categorize them and postulate step functions. By contrast, we propose to model possible non-linearity in the relationship between the outcome and several continuous predictors by estimating smooth functions of the predictors. We aim to demonstrate that a structured approach based on fractional polynomials can give a broadly satisfactory practical solution to the problem of simultaneously identifying a subset of 'important' predictors and determining the functional relationship for continuous predictors.
METHODS: We discuss the background, and motivate and describe the multivariable fractional polynomial (MFP) approach to model selection from data which include continuous and categorical predictors. We compare our results with those from other approaches in examples. We present a small simulation study to compare the functional form of the relationship obtained by fitting fractional polynomials and splines to a single predictor variable.
RESULTS: We illustrate the advantages of the MFP approach over standard techniques of model construction in two real example datasets analyzed with logistic and Cox regression models, respectively. In the simulation study, fractional polynomial models had lower mean square error and more realistic behaviour than comparable spline models.
CONCLUSIONS: In many practical situations, the MFP approach can satisfy the aim of finding models that fit the data well and also are simple, interpretable and potentially transportable to other settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16342923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Inf Med        ISSN: 0026-1270            Impact factor:   2.176


  65 in total

Review 1.  The cost of dichotomising continuous variables.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman; Patrick Royston
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-05-06

2.  Intrauterine exposure to lead may enhance sensitization to common inhalant allergens in early childhood: a prospective prebirth cohort study.

Authors:  Wieslaw Jedrychowski; Frederica Perera; Umberto Maugeri; Rachel L Miller; Maria Rembiasz; Elzbieta Flak; Elzbieta Mroz; Renata Majewska; Marek Zembala
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 6.498

3.  Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

Authors:  Christopher W Seymour; Vincent X Liu; Theodore J Iwashyna; Frank M Brunkhorst; Thomas D Rea; André Scherag; Gordon Rubenfeld; Jeremy M Kahn; Manu Shankar-Hari; Mervyn Singer; Clifford S Deutschman; Gabriel J Escobar; Derek C Angus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Risk Prediction for Early CKD in Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Daniela Dunkler; Peggy Gao; Shun Fu Lee; Georg Heinze; Catherine M Clase; Sheldon Tobe; Koon K Teo; Hertzel Gerstein; Johannes F E Mann; Rainer Oberbauer
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Analysis by categorizing or dichotomizing continuous variables is inadvisable: an example from the natural history of unruptured aneurysms.

Authors:  O Naggara; J Raymond; F Guilbert; D Roy; A Weill; D G Altman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Physician procedure volume and related adverse events after surgically induced abortion: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Ning Liu; Simone N Vigod; M Michèle Farrugia; Marcelo L Urquia; Joel G Ray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-05-12       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Adjustment for continuous confounders: an example of how to prevent residual confounding.

Authors:  Rolf H H Groenwold; Olaf H Klungel; Douglas G Altman; Yolanda van der Graaf; Arno W Hoes; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  A Clinical Prediction Model to Assess Risk for Pancreatic Cancer Among Patients With New-Onset Diabetes.

Authors:  Ben Boursi; Brian Finkelman; Bruce J Giantonio; Kevin Haynes; Anil K Rustgi; Andrew D Rhim; Ronac Mamtani; Yu-Xiao Yang
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Prognostic significance of pre-end-stage renal disease serum alkaline phosphatase for post-end-stage renal disease mortality in late-stage chronic kidney disease patients transitioning to dialysis.

Authors:  Keiichi Sumida; Miklos Z Molnar; Praveen K Potukuchi; Fridtjof Thomas; Jun Ling Lu; Yoshitsugu Obi; Connie M Rhee; Elani Streja; Kunihiro Yamagata; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Csaba P Kovesdy
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.992

10.  Blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio identifies a high-risk but potentially reversible form of renal dysfunction in patients with decompensated heart failure.

Authors:  Meredith A Brisco; Steven G Coca; Jennifer Chen; Anjali Tiku Owens; Brian D McCauley; Stephen E Kimmel; Jeffrey M Testani
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 8.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.