Literature DB >> 16342089

Comparison of the COX-inhibiting nitric oxide donator AZD3582 and rofecoxib in treating the signs and symptoms of Osteoarthritis of the knee.

Thomas J Schnitzer1, Alan J Kivitz, Robert S Lipetz, Nick Sanders, Angela Hee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of AZD3582 with that of rofecoxib, naproxen, and placebo in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, and to define the dosage of AZD3582 (125 mg, 375 mg, and 750 mg twice a day) that is noninferior in efficacy to rofecoxib.
METHODS: A double-blind study of 672 patients with OA of the knee was conducted. Patients who experienced increased pain on withdrawal of analgesia were randomized to receive AZD3582 125 mg, 375 mg, or 750 mg twice a day; rofecoxib 25 mg once a day; naproxen 500 mg twice a day; or placebo for 6 weeks. Efficacy, tolerability, and safety were monitored throughout the study. The primary variable was the change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain subscale from baseline to the mean of weeks 4 and 6, comparing AZD3582 with placebo for superiority and with rofecoxib for noninferiority using a predefined margin of 10 mm.
RESULTS: For the primary variable, AZD3582 375 mg and 750 mg were superior to placebo (least squares mean difference [95% confidence interval] -12 mm [-18, -6], P < 0.001 and -13 mm [-19, -7], P < 0.001, respectively) and were noninferior to rofecoxib (-2 mm [-8, 4], P < 0.001 and -3 mm [-9, 3], P < 0.001, respectively). AZD3582 125 mg was not significantly different from placebo for the primary variable.
CONCLUSION: AZD3582 375 mg and 750 mg twice a day were superior to placebo and as effective as rofecoxib 25 mg/day in treating the signs and symptoms of OA of the knee. AZD3582 125 mg twice a day was not statistically different from placebo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16342089     DOI: 10.1002/art.21586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  14 in total

1.  Modelling of pain intensity and informative dropout in a dental pain model after naproxcinod, naproxen and placebo administration.

Authors:  Marcus A Björnsson; Ulrika S H Simonsson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Comparative evaluation of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis on recommended doses of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Authors:  John Fabule; Ade Adebajo
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.346

3.  Treatment strategies for osteoarthritis patients with pain and hypertension.

Authors:  Paolo Verdecchia; Fabio Angeli; Giovanni Mazzotta; Paola Martire; Marta Garofoli; Giorgio Gentile; Gianpaolo Reboldi
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 4.  The dichotomous role of H2S in cancer cell biology? Déjà vu all over again.

Authors:  Khosrow Kashfi
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 5.858

5.  Long-term treatment with naproxcinod significantly improves skeletal and cardiac disease phenotype in the mdx mouse model of dystrophy.

Authors:  Kitipong Uaesoontrachoon; James L Quinn; Kathleen S Tatem; Jack H Van Der Meulen; Qing Yu; Aditi Phadke; Brittany K Miller; Heather Gordish-Dressman; Ennio Ongini; Daniela Miglietta; Kanneboyina Nagaraju
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 6.  Blood oxygen level-dependent MR imaging of the kidneys.

Authors:  Lu-Ping Li; Sarah Halter; Pottumarthi V Prasad
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.266

7.  Blood pressure effects of naproxcinod in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Raymond Townsend; Neville Bittar; Jeffrey Rosen; William Smith; Andrea Ramsay; Steven G Chrysant; Robert Weiss; Aldina Pivodic; Brigitte Duquesroix; Jacques Djian
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 8.  Carbon Monoxide and Nitric Oxide as Examples of the Youngest Class of Transmitters.

Authors:  Alicja Nowaczyk; Magdalena Kowalska; Jacek Nowaczyk; Grzegorz Grześk
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Common secondary causes of resistant hypertension and rational for treatment.

Authors:  Charles Faselis; Michael Doumas; Vasilios Papademetriou
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.420

Review 10.  Nitric oxide and cardiovascular effects: new insights in the role of nitric oxide for the management of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Isla S Mackenzie; Daniel Rutherford; Thomas M MacDonald
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 5.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.