Literature DB >> 16341874

Economy and efficiency of swimming at the surface with fins of different size and stiffness.

Paola Zamparo1, David R Pendergast, Albert Termin, Alberto E Minetti.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate how fins with varying physical characteristics affect the energy cost and the efficiency of aquatic locomotion. Experiments were performed on ten college swimmers who were asked to swim the dolphin kick while using a monofin (MF) and to swim the front crawl kick with a small-flexible fin (SF), a large-stiff fin (LS) and without fins (BF, barefoot). The energy expended to cover one unit distance (C) was highest for BF (C=10.6+/-1.8 kJ m(-1) kg(-1) at 0.8 m s(-1)) and decreased by about 50% with LS, 55% with SF and 60% with MF, allowing for an increase in speed (for a given metabolic power) of about 0.4 m s(-1) for MF and of about 0.2 m s(-1) for SF and LS (compared with BF). At any given speed, the fins for which C was lower were those with the lowest kick frequency (KF): KF=1.6+/-0.22 Hz at 0.8 m s(-1) (for BF) and decreased by about 40% for SF, 50% for LS and 60% for MF. The decrease in KF from BF to SF-LS and MF was essentially due to the increasing surface area of the fin which, in turn, was associated with a higher Froude efficiency (eta(F)). eta(F) was calculated by computing the speed of the bending waves moving along the body in a caudal direction (as proposed for the undulating movements of slender fish): it increased from 0.62+/-0.01 in BF to 0.66+/-0.03 in SF and 0.67+/-0.04 in LS reaching the highest values (0.76+/-0.05) with MF. No single fin characteristic can predict a swimmer's performance, rather the better fin (i.e. MF) is the one that is able to reduce most KF at any given speed and hence to produce the greatest distance per kick (d=v/KF). The latter indeed increased from 0.50+/-0.01 m in BF to about 0.90+/-0.05 m in SF and LS and reached values of 1.22+/-0.01 m in MF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16341874     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-005-0075-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  23 in total

Review 1.  Forces, fishes, and fluids: hydrodynamic mechanisms of aquatic locomotion.

Authors:  George V Lauder; Eliot G Drucker
Journal:  News Physiol Sci       Date:  2002-12

2.  Underwater fin swimming in women with reference to fin selection.

Authors:  D R Pendergast; J Mollendorf; C Logue; S Samimy
Journal:  Undersea Hyperb Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 0.698

3.  Evaluation of fins used in underwater swimming.

Authors:  D R Pendergast; J Mollendorf; C Logue; S Samimy
Journal:  Undersea Hyperb Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 0.698

4.  The anthropometry of the manual work space for the seated subject.

Authors:  W T Dempster; W C Gabel; W J Felts
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1959-12       Impact factor: 2.868

5.  Mechanical work and efficiency in level walking and running.

Authors:  G A Cavagna; M Kaneko
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Energetics of swimming in man.

Authors:  P E Di Prampero; D R Pendergast; D W Wilson; D W Rennie
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 3.531

7.  Energetics of underwater swimming with SCUBA.

Authors:  D R Pendergast; M Tedesco; D M Nawrocki; N M Fisher
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  How fish power swimming.

Authors:  L C Rome; D Swank; D Corda
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-07-16       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Propelling efficiency of front-crawl swimming.

Authors:  H M Toussaint; A Beelen; A Rodenburg; A J Sargeant; G de Groot; A P Hollander; G J van Ingen Schenau
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1988-12

10.  The swimming energetics of trout. II. Oxygen consumption and swimming efficiency.

Authors:  P W Webb
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  4 in total

1.  Kick frequency affects the energy cost of aquatic locomotion in elite monofin swimmers.

Authors:  Guillaume Boitel; Fabrice Vercruyssen; Morgan Alberty; Xavier Nesi; Lionel Bourdon; Jeanick Brisswalter
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Comparison of temporal parameters of swimming rescue elements when performed using dolphin and flutter kick with fins - didactical approach.

Authors:  Marek Rejman; Wojciech Wiesner; Piotr Silakiewicz; Andrzej Klarowicz; J Arturo Abraldes
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Differences in kinematics and energy cost between front crawl and backstroke below the anaerobic threshold.

Authors:  Tomohiro Gonjo; Carla McCabe; Ana Sousa; João Ribeiro; Ricardo J Fernandes; João Paulo Vilas-Boas; Ross Sanders
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Analysis of Relationships between the Level of Errors in Leg and Monofin Movement and Stroke Parameters in Monofin Swimming.

Authors:  Marek Rejman
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.