Literature DB >> 16341868

Can post-mortem blood be used for DNA profiling after peri-mortem blood transfusion?

E A M Graham1, M Tsokos, G N Rutty.   

Abstract

The question of whether blood transfusions can affect DNA profiling is still a contentious issue throughout the forensic community. It is hypothesised that donor leucocytes present in the administered blood will be detected upon examination of recipient blood. In order to resolve this issue, a selection of theoretical experiments were carried out to determine how much donor DNA must be present for its detection in blood components. Five casework examples of material collected from individuals after massive transfusion, including a case of whole organ transplantation, were also investigated. The results indicated that filtration processes used during blood production do not allow the passage of enough donor leucocytes for detection using current forensic profiling techniques. No evidence of secondary profile alleles were found in any case, indicating that peri-mortem blood transfusion does not affect DNA profiling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16341868     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-005-0063-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  22 in total

1.  Unusual results due to transfused blood.

Authors:  A K Davidson; L D Lee
Journal:  Sci Justice       Date:  1999 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.124

Review 2.  Application of low copy number DNA profiling.

Authors:  P Gill
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.351

3.  Differentiation of human bone marrow-derived cells into buccal epithelial cells in vivo: a molecular analytical study.

Authors:  Simon D Tran; Stanley R Pillemer; Amalia Dutra; A John Barrett; Michael J Brownstein; Sharon Key; Evgenia Pak; Rose Anne Leakan; Albert Kingman; Kenneth M Yamada; Bruce J Baum; Eva Mezey
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Restriction fragment length polymorphism and polymerase chain reaction: HLA-DQA1 and polymarker analysis of blood samples from transfusion recipients.

Authors:  Rajiv I Giroti; Rajesh Biswas; Kanchan Mukherjee
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Detection of microchimerism by PCR is a function of amplification strategy.

Authors:  W F Reed; T L Lee; E Trachtenberg; M Vinson; M P Busch
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.157

6.  Short tandem repeat (STRs) and sex specific Amelogenin analysis of blood samples from neurosurgical female transfused patients.

Authors:  Kanchan Kumar Mukherjee; Rajesh Biswas
Journal:  J Clin Forensic Med       Date:  2005-02

7.  Natural DNA mixtures generated in fraternal twins in utero.

Authors:  R J Rubocki; B J McCue; K J Duffy; K L Shepard; S J Shepherd; J L Wisecarver
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.832

8.  Survival of donor cells 25 years after intrauterine transfusion.

Authors:  H E Viëtor; E Hallensleben; S P van Bree; E M van der Meer; S E Kaal; J Bennebroek-Gravenhorst; H H Kanhai; A Brand; F H Claas
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Diagnosis of transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease by genetic fingerprinting and polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  E Kunstmann; T Bocker; L Roewer; H Sauer; W Mempel; J T Epplen
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  Persisting fetal microchimerism does not interfere with forensic Y-chromosome typing.

Authors:  M Klintschar; P Schwaiger; S Regauer; S Mannweiler; M Kleiber
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 2.395

View more
  3 in total

1.  Stored packed red blood cell transfusion up-regulates inflammatory gene expression in circulating leukocytes.

Authors:  Guillermo A Escobar; Aaron M Cheng; Ernest E Moore; Jeffrey L Johnson; Cynthia Tannahill; Henry V Baker; Lyle L Moldawer; Anirban Banerjee
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  One person with two DNA profiles: a(nother) case of mosaicism or chimerism.

Authors:  Vincent Castella; Maria del Mar Lesta; Patrice Mangin
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  The effect on cadaver blood DNA identification by the use of targeted and whole body post-mortem computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Guy N Rutty; Jade Barber; Jasmin Amoroso; Bruno Morgan; Eleanor A M Graham
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 2.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.