PURPOSE: The rationale for this pilot study was to add arterio-venous dissection (AVD) after unsuccessful medical treatment in a well-defined group of patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). METHODS: In this prospective, interventional case series 35 consecutive patients with a visual acuity (VA) of 0.4 (logMar) or worse were scheduled for surgery within the first 3 months of the onset of BRVO. The study endpoint was VA 1 year after AVD. Secondary study endpoints were: correlation of VA and successful vessel dissection; complication rate; and number of additional surgical procedures within the first year of AVD. RESULTS: Preoperative VA (logMar) was 0.82+/-0.05 (range 0.2-1.6). VA 6 weeks postoperatively was 0.54+/-0.06 (range 0-1.6), 3 months postoperatively 0.61+/-0.07 (0-1.56), 6 months postoperatively 0.74+/-0.08 (range 0-2) and 12 months postoperatively 0.55+/-0.07 (range 0.1-1.5). VA improved 1 year after AVD (p=0.0004). An improvement in VA did not depend on successful separation of the artery and the vein. Four patients had a retinal detachment, 19 patients needed cataract surgery within the first year of AVD. A total of 24 additional surgical procedures were needed. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with BRVO may profit from AVD compared with a historical control group. Visual improvement was found irrespective of the successful dissection of vessels. The cataract formation rate and additional surgery was a shortcoming of the AVD procedure.
PURPOSE: The rationale for this pilot study was to add arterio-venous dissection (AVD) after unsuccessful medical treatment in a well-defined group of patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). METHODS: In this prospective, interventional case series 35 consecutive patients with a visual acuity (VA) of 0.4 (logMar) or worse were scheduled for surgery within the first 3 months of the onset of BRVO. The study endpoint was VA 1 year after AVD. Secondary study endpoints were: correlation of VA and successful vessel dissection; complication rate; and number of additional surgical procedures within the first year of AVD. RESULTS: Preoperative VA (logMar) was 0.82+/-0.05 (range 0.2-1.6). VA 6 weeks postoperatively was 0.54+/-0.06 (range 0-1.6), 3 months postoperatively 0.61+/-0.07 (0-1.56), 6 months postoperatively 0.74+/-0.08 (range 0-2) and 12 months postoperatively 0.55+/-0.07 (range 0.1-1.5). VA improved 1 year after AVD (p=0.0004). An improvement in VA did not depend on successful separation of the artery and the vein. Four patients had a retinal detachment, 19 patients needed cataract surgery within the first year of AVD. A total of 24 additional surgical procedures were needed. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with BRVO may profit from AVD compared with a historical control group. Visual improvement was found irrespective of the successful dissection of vessels. The cataract formation rate and additional surgery was a shortcoming of the AVD procedure.
Authors: J F Le Rouic; R A Bejjani; F Rumen; C Caudron; O Bettembourg; G Renard; D Chauvaud Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 3.117