Literature DB >> 16341486

Seprafilm does not aggravate intraperitoneal septic conditions or evoke systemic inflammatory response.

Keiichi Uchida1, Hisashi Urata, Yasuhiko Mohri, Mikihiro Inoue, Chikao Miki, Masato Kusunoki.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether Seprafilm aggravates the systemic inflammatory response and adversely affects the outcome of postoperative intraperitoneal septic conditions.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the relationship between the intraperitoneal placement of Seprafilm and the rate of intraperitoneal septic complications in 278 consecutive patients. Experimentally, 40 rats were subjected to laparotomy with or without the intraperitoneal placement of Seprafilm. Bacterial peritonitis was induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) and the serum cytokine levels were measured.
RESULTS: Seprafilm did not increase the rate of septic complications or aggravate inflammatory responses in patients with or without postoperative intraperitoneal inflammatory complications. Experimentally, there was no significant difference between the serum inflammatory cytokine levels after CLP with or without Seprafilm.
CONCLUSIONS: Seprafilm did not adversely affect postoperative inflammatory response or clinical outcomes, even in patients with intraperitoneal septic complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16341486     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-005-3085-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  21 in total

1.  Reconstruction of the pelvic floor using absorbable mesh with a bioresorbable membrane (Seprafilm) after abdominoperineal rectal excision.

Authors:  M Kusunoki; H Yanagi; Y Shoji; M Noda; H Ikeuchi; T Yamamura
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Effect of surgical adhesion reduction devices on the propagation of experimental intra-abdominal infection.

Authors:  A O Tzianabos; R L Cisneros; J Gershkovich; J Johnson; R J Miller; J W Burns; A B Onderdonk
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1999-11

3.  Cellular mechanism of intraabdominal abscess formation by Bacteroides fragilis.

Authors:  F C Gibson; A B Onderdonk; D L Kasper; A O Tzianabos
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 4.  Sepsis and septic shock--a review of laboratory models and a proposal.

Authors:  K A Wichterman; A E Baue; I H Chaudry
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Tumor necrosis factor-dependent adhesions as a major protective mechanism early in septic peritonitis in mice.

Authors:  B Echtenacher; K Weigl; N Lehn; D N Männel
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Reduction of adhesions after uterine myomectomy by Seprafilm membrane (HAL-F): a blinded, prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical study. Seprafilm Adhesion Study Group.

Authors:  M P Diamond
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 7.  Preclinical evaluation of Seprafilm bioresorbable membrane.

Authors:  J W Burns; M J Colt; L S Burgees; K C Skinner
Journal:  Eur J Surg Suppl       Date:  1997

8.  Prevention of postoperative pericardial adhesions with a hyaluronic acid coating solution. Experimental safety and efficacy studies.

Authors:  J D Mitchell; R Lee; G T Hodakowski; K Neya; W Harringer; C R Valeri; G J Vlahakes
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Sodium hyaluronate as an adjunct in adhesion prevention after flexor tendon surgery in rabbits.

Authors:  L Hagberg; B Gerdin
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.230

10.  Tumor necrosis factor-alpha: a marker for peritoneal adhesion formation.

Authors:  A A Kaidi; T Gurchumelidze; M Nazzal; P Figert; C Vanterpool; Y Silva
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.192

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy and safety of Seprafilm for preventing postoperative abdominal adhesion: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qiqiang Zeng; Zhengping Yu; Jie You; Qiyu Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Trehalose does not affect the functions of human neutrophils in vitro.

Authors:  Koji Tanaka; Mikio Kawamura; Kohei Otake; Yuji Toiyama; Yoshinaga Okugawa; Yasuhiro Inoue; Keiichi Uchida; Toshimitsu Araki; Yasuhiko Mohri; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Comparison of the two types of bioresorbable barriers to prevent intra-abdominal adhesions in rats.

Authors:  Eren Ersoy; Vedat Ozturk; Aylin Yazgan; Mehmet Ozdogan; Haldun Gundogdu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Hyaluronate carboxymethylcellulose-based bioresorbable membrane (Seprafilm) reduces adhesion under the incision to make unplanned re-laparotomy safer.

Authors:  Daisuke Hashimoto; Masahiko Hirota; Yasushi Yagi; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Circumferential strain rate to detect lipopolysaccharide-induced cardiac dysfunction: a speckle tracking echocardiography study.

Authors:  Ming Chu; Lijun Qian; Menglin Zhu; Jing Yao; Di Xu; Minglong Chen
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-02

6.  Seprafilm® adhesion barrier: (1) a review of preclinical, animal, and human investigational studies.

Authors:  Michael P Diamond; Ellen L Burns; Beverly Accomando; Sadiqa Mian; Lena Holmdahl
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2012-04-20

7.  Seprafilm(®) adhesion barrier: (2) a review of the clinical literature on intraabdominal use.

Authors:  Michael P Diamond; Ellen L Burns; Beverly Accomando; Sadiqa Mian; Lena Holmdahl
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2012-04-15

8.  Comparison of a chymase inhibitor and hyaluronic acid/carboxymethylcellulose (Seprafilm) in a novel peritoneal adhesion model in rats.

Authors:  Maiko Ozeki; Denan Jin; Yuta Miyaoka; Shinsuke Masubuchi; Fumitoshi Hirokawa; Michihiro Hayashi; Shinji Takai; Kazuhisa Uchiyama
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.