Literature DB >> 16341485

Tension-free hernioplasty versus conventional hernioplasty for inguinal hernia repair.

Emilio Prieto-Díaz-Chávez1, José Luis Medina-Chávez, Alejandro González-Ojeda, Rafael Coll-Cárdenas, Oscar Uribarren-Berrueta, Benjamín Trujillo-Hernández, Clemente Vásquez.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To show the effectiveness of tension-free hernioplasty for inguinal hernia repair.
METHODS: We studied 106 patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair, as conventional hernioplasty in 52 and as tension-free hernioplasty in 54. We analyzed the operation time, postoperative complications, pain, time to resume daily activities, and frequency of recurrence in the short and long term.
RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 46.2 years. The operation time was significantly shorter in the tension-free group than in the conventional group, at 33 +/- 11.1 versus 49 +/- 8.8 min, respectively (P < 0.05). The overall complication rate was 10%, being 1.5% in the tension-free group and 13% in the conventional group (P = 0.4). The visual-analogue pain scores after surgery were lower in the tension-free group than in the conventional group (P = 0.01). Patients in the tension-free group returned to their normal activities sooner than those in the conventional group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Tension-free hernioplasty resulted in less pain and allowed patients to return to their daily activities sooner than conventional hernioplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16341485     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-005-3087-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  24 in total

1.  The recurrent groin hernia: therapeutic solutions.

Authors:  L M Nyhus
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Historical evolution of inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  M Sachs; M Damm; A Encke
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Sutureless technique: second version.

Authors:  A I Gilbert; M F Graham
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Short-term outcome after mesh or shouldice herniorrhaphy: a randomized, prospective study.

Authors:  R J Barth; K W Burchard; A Tosteson; J E Sutton; T A Colacchio; H F Henriques; R Howard; S Steadman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Individualization of hernia repair: a new era.

Authors:  L M Nyhus
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  The Lichtenstein open "tension-free" mesh repair of inguinal hernias.

Authors:  P K Amid; A G Shulman; I L Lichtenstein
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Demographic, classificatory, and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States.

Authors:  I M Rutkow; A W Robbins
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  "Tension-free" inguinal herniorrhaphy: a preliminary report on the "mesh plug" technique.

Authors:  I M Rutkow; A W Robbins
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Local anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair step-by-step procedure.

Authors:  P K Amid; A G Shulman; I L Lichtenstein
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  A prospective audit of Lichtenstein's tension-free herniorrhaphy in Taranaki, New Zealand.

Authors:  M Hulme-Moir; S Kyle
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1998-11
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Inguinal hernia.

Authors:  Sanjay Purkayastha; Andre Chow; Thanos Athanasiou; Paris Tekkis; Ara Darzi
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-07-16

2.  Comparison of inguinal hernia repairs performed with lichtenstein, rutkow-robbins, and gilbert double layer graft methods.

Authors:  A Serdar Karaca; Omer Faik Ersoy; Namik Ozkan; Mehmet Ali Yerdel
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 0.656

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.