N A Mandall1, U Qureshi, U Quereshi, L Harvey. 1. Orthodontic Department, University Dental Hospital of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, M15 6FH. nicky@fs1.den.man.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate GDP opinion about a teledentistry system to screen new patient orthodontic referrals. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional questionnaire. SAMPLE: Two hundred general dental practitioners (GDPs) were approached from Stockport, Rochdale, Oldham, Bury and Bolton in Greater Manchester, and High Peak in Derbyshire. METHOD: A questionnaire about a teledentistry system for new orthodontic patients was developed, following interviews with eight GDPs participating in a teledentistry trial. The questionnaire was posted to another 200 GDPs who were asked questions on issues such as the efficiency of a teledentistry system; the usefulness of a teledentistry system from the patients' point of view; their view of a teledentistry system; and any concerns they had relating to security, confidentiality and consent. RESULTS: Seventy one per cent of GDPs thought teledentistry for orthodontic referrals would be a good idea. At least 90% of responders agreed or neither agreed nor disagreed that patients would benefit from such a system. Over half of GDPs agreed or strongly agreed that there would be implications on their surgery time, expense and equipment security. CONCLUSIONS: GDPs generally supported a teledentistry system for new patient orthodontic referrals. Although perceived patient advantages were agreed, GDPs tended to be less sure about the impact on them in terms of set-up expenses, time in the surgery and appropriate remuneration.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate GDP opinion about a teledentistry system to screen new patient orthodontic referrals. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional questionnaire. SAMPLE: Two hundred general dental practitioners (GDPs) were approached from Stockport, Rochdale, Oldham, Bury and Bolton in Greater Manchester, and High Peak in Derbyshire. METHOD: A questionnaire about a teledentistry system for new orthodontic patients was developed, following interviews with eight GDPs participating in a teledentistry trial. The questionnaire was posted to another 200 GDPs who were asked questions on issues such as the efficiency of a teledentistry system; the usefulness of a teledentistry system from the patients' point of view; their view of a teledentistry system; and any concerns they had relating to security, confidentiality and consent. RESULTS: Seventy one per cent of GDPs thought teledentistry for orthodontic referrals would be a good idea. At least 90% of responders agreed or neither agreed nor disagreed that patients would benefit from such a system. Over half of GDPs agreed or strongly agreed that there would be implications on their surgery time, expense and equipment security. CONCLUSIONS:GDPs generally supported a teledentistry system for new patient orthodontic referrals. Although perceived patient advantages were agreed, GDPs tended to be less sure about the impact on them in terms of set-up expenses, time in the surgery and appropriate remuneration.
Authors: Soulafa A Almazrooa; Ghada A Mansour; Sana A Alhamed; Sarah A Ali; Sara K Akeel; Nada A Alhindi; Osama M Felemban; Hani H Mawardi; Nada O Binmadi Journal: J Dent Sci Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 2.080
Authors: Christopher K Wallace; Charlotte E Schofield; Lucy A L Burbridge; Katherine L O'Donnell Journal: Br Dent J Date: 2021-06-25 Impact factor: 2.727