Mark P Jensen1, Michael Friedman, Daniel Bonzo, Patricia Richards. 1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine and Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Seattle, WA 98195-6490, USA. mjensen@u.washington.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: In controlled trials of analgesics for the treatment of neuropathic pain, the primary outcome variable is most often a measure of global pain intensity. However, because neuropathic pain is associated with a variety of pain sensations, the effects of analgesic treatments on different sensations could go undetected if specific pain qualities are not assessed. This study sought to evaluate the utility of assessing the multiple components of neuropathic pain in an analgesic clinical trial. METHODS:One hundred fifty-nine subjects with diabetes-related foot pain were randomly assigned to receive an active analgesic (controlled-release oxycodone) or matching placebo for 6 weeks. A multidimensional measure of neuropathic pain, the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS), was administered before, during, and after study treatment. RESULTS: Relative to placebo, the opioid analgesic produced statistically significantly greater decreases in global pain intensity, pain unpleasantness, and sharp, dull, and deep pain sensations. Responder analyses indicated a higher rate of responding to the opioid condition, relative to placebo, for intense, unpleasant, deep, and surface pain. The opioid analgesic did not significantly reduce hot, cold, itchy, or sensitive pain sensations compared with placebo in either analysis. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the utility of the NPS for characterizing the multidimensional nature of the neuropathic pain experience and for detecting changes in neuropathic pain with treatment.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: In controlled trials of analgesics for the treatment of neuropathic pain, the primary outcome variable is most often a measure of global pain intensity. However, because neuropathic pain is associated with a variety of pain sensations, the effects of analgesic treatments on different sensations could go undetected if specific pain qualities are not assessed. This study sought to evaluate the utility of assessing the multiple components of neuropathic pain in an analgesic clinical trial. METHODS: One hundred fifty-nine subjects with diabetes-related foot pain were randomly assigned to receive an active analgesic (controlled-release oxycodone) or matching placebo for 6 weeks. A multidimensional measure of neuropathic pain, the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS), was administered before, during, and after study treatment. RESULTS: Relative to placebo, the opioid analgesic produced statistically significantly greater decreases in global pain intensity, pain unpleasantness, and sharp, dull, and deep pain sensations. Responder analyses indicated a higher rate of responding to the opioid condition, relative to placebo, for intense, unpleasant, deep, and surface pain. The opioid analgesic did not significantly reduce hot, cold, itchy, or sensitive pain sensations compared with placebo in either analysis. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the utility of the NPS for characterizing the multidimensional nature of the neuropathic pain experience and for detecting changes in neuropathic pain with treatment.
Authors: Christine Miaskowski; Judy Mastick; Steven M Paul; Kimberly Topp; Betty Smoot; Gary Abrams; Lee-May Chen; Kord M Kober; Yvette P Conley; Margaret Chesney; Kay Bolla; Grace Mausisa; Melissa Mazor; Melisa Wong; Mark Schumacher; Jon D Levine Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2017-01-04 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Ting Bao; Olga Goloubeva; Colleen Pelser; Neil Porter; James Primrose; Lisa Hester; Mariola Sadowska; Rena Lapidus; Michelle Medeiros; Lixing Lao; Susan G Dorsey; Ashraf Z Badros Journal: Integr Cancer Ther Date: 2014-05-26 Impact factor: 3.279
Authors: W Iris Zhi; Patricia Chen; Alice Kwon; Connie Chen; Steven E Harte; Lauren Piulson; Susan Li; Sujata Patil; Jun J Mao; Ting Bao Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2019-08-27 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Christine Miaskowski; Steven M Paul; Judy Mastick; Mark Schumacher; Yvette P Conley; Betty Smoot; Gary Abrams; Kord M Kober; Steven Cheung; Jennifer Henderson-Sabes; Margaret Chesney; Melissa Mazor; Margaret Wallhagen; Jon D Levine Journal: Eur J Oncol Nurs Date: 2017-11-07 Impact factor: 2.398
Authors: Ting Bao; Andrew D Seidman; Lauren Piulson; Emily Vertosick; Xi Chen; Andrew J Vickers; Victoria S Blinder; Wanqing I Zhi; Qing Li; Linda T Vahdat; Maura N Dickler; Mark E Robson; Jun J Mao Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2018-07-13 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: W Iris Zhi; Raymond E Baser; Alice Kwon; Connie Chen; Susan Qing Li; Lauren Piulson; Christina Seluzicki; Katherine S Panageas; Steven E Harte; Jun J Mao; Ting Bao Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2021-01-28 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Daniel Ciampi de Andrade; Karine A S L Ferreira; Carine M Nishimura; Lyn T Yeng; Abrahão F Batista; Katia de Sá; Joaci Araujo; Patrick R N A G Stump; Helena H Kaziyama; Ricardo Galhardoni; Erich T Fonoff; Gerson Ballester; Telma Zakka; Didier Bouhassira; Manoel J Teixeira Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2011-11-30 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Ellen M Lavoie Smith; Marie A Bakitas; Peter Homel; Camilo Fadul; Louise Meyer; Karen Skalla; Marilyn Bookbinder Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2009 Impact factor: 1.771