Literature DB >> 1634043

The diffusion of new genetic tests for predicting disease.

N A Holtzman1.   

Abstract

This paper examines the pathways by which new genetic tests will become available to the public. In view of the scarcity of genetic specialists, the pathway is likely to involve primary care physicians. Other pathways entail state-mandated testing, community-based programs, or testing by laboratories without much involvement of primary care physicians. When testing does become available the "destination" will be either family-centered testing or population-oriented screening. The deterrent to screening will not be the inability to detect disease-causing mutations but the costs and attitudes of providers and the public. When tests are provided primarily to provide information about risks to future children, some people will oppose screening on religious or moral grounds. When there are no inexpensive treatments, some will fear that insurance companies and employers will use tests to deny them health care coverage. Some may not want to know their risks for disorders about which little can be done. For common, multifactorial disorders, genetic tests will have low predictive value. Because of these problems, the decision to be tested, regardless of the destination, requires that "testees" be fully informed and consent to testing. When acceptance rates are low, screening is less likely to be cost-effective; family-centered testing becomes the default destination.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1634043     DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.6.10.1634043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FASEB J        ISSN: 0892-6638            Impact factor:   5.191


  7 in total

1.  Individual, family, and societal dimensions of genetic discrimination: a case study analysis.

Authors:  Lisa N Geller; Joseph S Alper; Paul R Billings; Carol I Barash; Jonathan Beckwith; Marvin R Natowicz
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Demographic Studies from a National Gaucher Disease Screening Program.

Authors:  D M Gagnon; E Pergament; B A Fine
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Epidemiological evaluation of the use of genetics to improve the predictive value of disease risk factors.

Authors:  M J Khoury; D K Wagener
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Evaluating medical effectiveness for the california health benefits review program.

Authors:  Harold S Luft; Karen M Rappaport; Edward H Yelin; Wade M Aubry
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  A testable prognostic model of nicotine dependence.

Authors:  Rachel Badovinac Ramoni; Nancy L Saccone; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Laura J Bierut; Marco F Ramoni
Journal:  J Neurogenet       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 1.250

6.  Prenatal genetic counseling for hemoglobinopathy carriers: a comparison of primary providers of prenatal care and professional genetic counselors.

Authors:  P T Rowley; S Loader; C J Sutera; A Kozyra
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Integrating stakeholder perspectives into the translation of cell-free fetal DNA testing for aneuploidy.

Authors:  Lauren C Sayres; Megan Allyse; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 11.117

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.