Literature DB >> 16340391

An investigation of moral judgement in frontotemporal dementia.

Mario F Mendez1, Eric Anderson, Jill S Shapira.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the basis of disturbed moral judgment in patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD).
BACKGROUND: FTD is characterized by difficulty in modulating social behavior. Patients lack social propriety and may perform sociopathic acts. In addition, FTD patients often lack empathy for others. These findings suggest alterations in the nature of morality in patients with FTD.
METHOD: We administered an inventory of moral knowledge and two moral dilemmas to 26 patients with the frontal variant of FTD, 26 patients with Alzheimer disease (AD), and 26 normal control subjects. The FTD patients met Consensus Criteria for FTD and had corroborative frontal abnormalities on functional neuroimaging. The FTD and AD patients were comparably impaired on dementia measures.
RESULTS: All these groups showed the retention of knowledge for moral behavior and the ability to make "impersonal" moral judgments. In contrast, the FTD patients were impaired in their ability to make immediate, emotionally based moral judgments compared with the patients with AD and the normal control subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings are consistent with an attenuation of the automatic emotional identification with others that is part of the innate moral sense. Such a disturbance may result from neurodegenerative disease affecting the ventromedial frontal cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16340391     DOI: 10.1097/01.wnn.0000191292.17964.bb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol        ISSN: 1543-3633            Impact factor:   1.600


  55 in total

1.  Disruption of the right temporoparietal junction with transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces the role of beliefs in moral judgments.

Authors:  Liane Young; Joan Albert Camprodon; Marc Hauser; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Rebecca Saxe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment.

Authors:  Joshua D Greene; Sylvia A Morelli; Kelly Lowenberg; Leigh E Nystrom; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-12-26

3.  Are 'counter-intuitive' deontological judgments really counter-intuitive? An empirical reply to.

Authors:  Joseph M Paxton; Tommaso Bruni; Joshua D Greene
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Patterns of neural activity associated with honest and dishonest moral decisions.

Authors:  Joshua D Greene; Joseph M Paxton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The spectrum of sociopathy in dementia.

Authors:  Mario F Mendez; Jill S Shapira; Ronald E Saul
Journal:  J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.198

Review 6.  Neuroimaging Abnormalities in Neurological Patients with Criminal Behavior.

Authors:  R Ryan Darby
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 5.081

7.  Psychopaths know right from wrong but don't care.

Authors:  Maaike Cima; Franca Tonnaer; Marc D Hauser
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 8.  Selective functional, regional, and neuronal vulnerability in frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  William W Seeley
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.710

9.  Selective deficit in personal moral judgment following damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Elisa Ciaramelli; Michela Muccioli; Elisabetta Làdavas; Giuseppe di Pellegrino
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 10.  Clinical diagnostic criteria and classification controversies in frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

Authors:  Katya Rascovsky; Murray Grossman
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2013-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.