Literature DB >> 16340355

Hemodynamic modes of ventricular assist with a rotary blood pump: continuous, pulsatile, and failure.

Stijn Vandenberghe1, Patrick Segers, James F Antaki, Bart Meyns, Pascal R Verdonck.   

Abstract

Pulsatile operation of rotary blood pumps (RBPs) has received interest due to potential concern with nonphysiological hemodynamics. This study aimed to gain insight to the effects of various RBP modes on the heart-device interaction. A Deltastream diagonal pump (Medos Medizintechnik GmbH) was inserted in a cardiovascular simulator with apical-to-ascending aorta cannulation. The pump was run in continuous mode with incrementally increasing rotating speed (0-5000 rpm). This was repeated for three heart rates (50-100-150 bpm) and three levels of left ventricular (LV) contractility. Subsequently, the Deltastream was run in pulsatile mode to elucidate the effect of (de)synchronization between heart and pump. LV volume and pressure, arterial pressure, flows, and energetic parameters were used to evaluate the interaction. Pump failure (0 rpm) resulted in aortic pressure drops (17-46 mm Hg) from baseline. In continuous mode, pump flow compensated by diminished aortic flow, thus yielding constant total flow. High continuous rotating speed resulted in acute hypertension (mean aortic pressure up to 178 mm Hg). In pulsatile mode, unmatched heart and pulsatile pump rates yielded unphysiologic pressure and flow patterns and LV unloading was found to be highly dependent on synchronization phase. Optimal unloading was achieved when the minimum rotating speed occurred at end-systole. We conclude that, in continuous mode, a perfusion benefit can only be achieved if the continuous pump flow exceeds the preimplant (baseline) cardiac output. Pulsatile mode of support results in complex pressure and volume variations and requires accurate triggering to achieve optimal unloading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16340355     DOI: 10.1097/01.mat.0000179251.40649.45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  5 in total

1.  Computational modelling and evaluation of cardiovascular response under pulsatile impeller pump support.

Authors:  Yubing Shi; Alistair G Brown; Patricia V Lawford; Andreas Arndt; Peter Nuesser; D Rodney Hose
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Mathematical evaluation of cardiac beat synchronization control used for a rotary blood pump.

Authors:  Daisuke Ogawa; Shinji Kobayashi; Kenji Yamazaki; Tadashi Motomura; Takashi Nishimura; Junichi Shimamura; Tomonori Tsukiya; Toshihide Mizuno; Yoshiaki Takewa; Eisuke Tatsumi
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2019-07-20       Impact factor: 1.731

3.  Comparison of continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist devices: is there an advantage to pulsatility?

Authors:  Allen Cheng; Christine A Williamitis; Mark S Slaughter
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-11

4.  Change in myocardial oxygen consumption employing continuous-flow LVAD with cardiac beat synchronizing system, in acute ischemic heart failure models.

Authors:  Akihide Umeki; Takashi Nishimura; Yoshiaki Takewa; Masahiko Ando; Mamoru Arakawa; Yuichiro Kishimoto; Tomonori Tsukiya; Toshihide Mizuno; Shunei Kyo; Minoru Ono; Yoshiyuki Taenaka; Eisuke Tatsumi
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 1.731

5.  An Intra-Cycle Optimal Control Framework for Ventricular Assist Devices Based on Atrioventricular Plane Displacement Modeling.

Authors:  Clemens Zeile; Thomas Rauwolf; Alexander Schmeisser; Jeremi Kaj Mizerski; Rüdiger C Braun-Dullaeus; Sebastian Sager
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 3.934

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.