Literature DB >> 16340221

Common pitfalls in the conduct of clinical research.

Michael Zlowodzki1, Anders Jonsson, Mohit Bhandari.   

Abstract

Recently, paradigm shift from expert opinion towards evidence-based medicine has occurred encouraging physicians to base their treatment decisions on the best available research evidence. In the hierarchy of evidence randomized clinical trials (level 1 evidence) are considered of the highest quality (least biased) while non-randomized studies represent lower levels (levels 2-4). Several pitfalls in the design and conduct of clinical research include: lack of randomization, lack of concealment, lack of blinding, and errors in hypothesis testing (type I and II errors). A basic understanding of these principles of research will empower both investigators and readers when applying the results of research to clinical practice.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16340221     DOI: 10.1159/000089379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Princ Pract        ISSN: 1011-7571            Impact factor:   1.927


  7 in total

1.  Practical tips for surgical research: introduction to the series.

Authors:  Forough Farrokhyar; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  Clinical trial design in non-invasive brain stimulation psychiatric research.

Authors:  André Russowsky Brunoni; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.035

Review 3.  Perinatal epidemiology: Issues, challenges, and potential solutions.

Authors:  Konstantinos Giannakou
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2020-09-01

Review 4.  Changes in clinical trials methodology over time: a systematic review of six decades of research in psychopharmacology.

Authors:  André R Brunoni; Laura Tadini; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Reaching consensus on the physiotherapeutic management of patients following upper abdominal surgery: a pragmatic approach to interpret equivocal evidence.

Authors:  Susan D Hanekom; Dina Brooks; Linda Denehy; Monika Fagevik-Olsén; Timothy C Hardcastle; Shamila Manie; Quinette Louw
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 6.  Using multiple types of studies in systematic reviews of health care interventions--a systematic review.

Authors:  Frank Peinemann; Doreen Allen Tushabe; Jos Kleijnen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS IN ORTHOPEDICS: DIFFICULTIES AND LIMITATIONS.

Authors:  Eduardo Angeli Malavolta; Marco Kawamura Demange; Riccardo Gomes Gobbi; Marta Imamura; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.