Literature DB >> 16340049

Evaluation of an Internet delivered pediatric diagnosis support system (ISABEL) in a tertiary care center in India.

Sandeep B Bavdekar1, Mandar Pawar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Young graduates manning the emergency rooms in public hospitals often need guidance in diagnosing critically ill patients due to their limited clinical experience. Textbooks, manuals and several websites are of limited assistance, as they do not generate patient-specific advice. ISABEL diagnostic tool, an Internet-delivered pediatric diagnosis support system that provides such information has not been evaluated in developing countries. AIM: To study the sensitivity of the ISABEL diagnostic tool. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: Records of patients admitted in the pediatric intensive care unit in a metropolitan hospital in India during January 2000-July 2002 were retrieved. Resident medical officers wrote key clinical and laboratory findings on the basis of admission notes and results of investigations carried out within 30 min of admission. The list of diagnoses generated by the diagnostic tool at the ISABEL site after submission of these terms was entered in a performa. The presence of final diagnosis in the list generated by the ISABEL was the outcome measure studied.
RESULTS: Records of 200 subjects (boys 111, girls 89, aged 28 days-12 years) were analyzed. Congenital heart disease, respiratory tract infections, meningitis, tetanus and septicemia were the most frequently encountered diagnoses. The diagnostic tool missed 27 diagnoses (such as septicemia, tuberculosis and seizures) in 39 subjects providing a sensitivity of 80.5%.
CONCLUSION: Even without any training offered to the users, ISABEL provided a reasonable sensitivity of 80.5%. The tool holds promise of being useful in the developing countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16340049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian Pediatr        ISSN: 0019-6061            Impact factor:   1.411


  8 in total

1.  SANDS: a service-oriented architecture for clinical decision support in a National Health Information Network.

Authors:  Adam Wright; Dean F Sittig
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 2.  Computerized decision support in adult and pediatric critical care.

Authors:  Cydni N Williams; Susan L Bratton; Eliotte L Hirshberg
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-11-04

3.  Should electronic differential diagnosis support be used early or late in the diagnostic process? A multicentre experimental study of Isabel.

Authors:  Matt Sibbald; Sandra Monteiro; Jonathan Sherbino; Andrew LoGiudice; Charles Friedman; Geoffrey Norman
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 7.418

Review 4.  Use of health information technology to reduce diagnostic errors.

Authors:  Robert El-Kareh; Omar Hasan; Gordon D Schiff
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 7.035

5.  Benchmarking Triage Capability of Symptom Checkers Against That of Medical Laypersons: Survey Study.

Authors:  Markus A Feufel; Felix Balzer; Malte L Schmieding; Rudolf Mörgeli; Maike A L Schmieding
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  The effects of mobile health on emergency care in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  W Tyler Winders; Stephanie C Garbern; Corey B Bills; Pryanka Relan; Megan L Schultz; Indi Trehan; Sean M Kivlehan; Torben K Becker; Ruth McQuillan
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 4.413

7.  The utility of an online diagnostic decision support system (Isabel) in general practice: a process evaluation.

Authors:  Emily J Henderson; Greg P Rubin
Journal:  JRSM Short Rep       Date:  2013-04-04

Review 8.  The Effectiveness of Electronic Differential Diagnoses (DDX) Generators: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas Riches; Maria Panagioti; Rahul Alam; Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi; Stephen Campbell; Aneez Esmail; Peter Bower
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.